Now playing on dirty.radio: Loading...

  Dirty Forums > world.
Register FAQ Community Today's Posts Search

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-05-2008, 07:59 PM
jOHN rODRIGUEZ
SystematicallyDisadsomthg
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: THE PLAsTIC VOORRTEEXXX!!!
Posts: 3,572
Possible positive change?
http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapc...lks/index.html

Change doesn't happen overnight, but I must say I feel a bit warm & fuzzy in the heart region after reading this.
__________________
8=====)~~(=====8

  #2  
Old 10-05-2008, 08:07 PM
kagenaki koe
children are futura
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 542
Re: Possible positive change?
McCain and Palin will say that's an irresponsible thing to do.
  #3  
Old 10-05-2008, 11:13 PM
dubman
BigColor&Excited4SoupMan
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,601
Re: Possible positive change?
oh buddy
do yr best rodney dangerfield impression here
  #4  
Old 10-06-2008, 01:09 AM
BeautifulBurnout
MadMinistrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,522
Re: Possible positive change?
It is a step in the right direction but my gut tells me that until occupying forces are withdrawn from Afghan territory, the Taliban (a splinter group of the Mujahideen - remember when they were on our side, guys, when the Russkies were the occupiers? ) are just going to keep on fighting.

Edit: Interesting development here too.
Quote:
Britain is stepping up pressure for a political and diplomatic settlement to the conflict in Afghanistan, a move set in sharp relief yesterday by the commander of UK troops who warned that the war against the Taliban was not going to be won.


The message is being delivered with increasing urgency by British military commanders, diplomats and intelligence officers, to Nato allies and governments in the region, the Guardian has learned.


"We're not going to win this war," Brigadier Mark Carleton-Smith said yesterday. "It's about reducing it to a manageable level of insurgency that's not a strategic threat and can be managed by the Afghan army. We may well leave with there still being a low but steady ebb of rural insurgency."

Two things spring to mind: 1. The West is running out of money to waste on stupid wars. 2. At this critical point in the run-up to the US elections, neither party will want to be seen as backing down, so it is up to the Brits to be mooting this, for the time being. But as soon as November 5th has come and gone, the US will be toeing the same line.
__________________
"If I can't dance, I don't want to be part of your revolution" - Emma Goldman

Last edited by BeautifulBurnout; 10-06-2008 at 01:21 AM.
  #5  
Old 10-07-2008, 02:19 AM
BeautifulBurnout
MadMinistrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,522
Re: Possible positive change?
...and Robert Gates keeps the blinkers on. Or maybe he is just trying to keep the wool over the electorate's eyes.

"We are winning the war. No, really we are. Honest. Well, we have just about won it. This is nothing like 'Nam at all..."

__________________
"If I can't dance, I don't want to be part of your revolution" - Emma Goldman
  #6  
Old 10-07-2008, 11:25 AM
IsiliRunite
de la Michigan
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ann Arbor
Posts: 536
Send a message via AIM to IsiliRunite
Re: Possible positive change?
Its possible they might be doing this to renegotiate in the future after the United States does something they don't like, trying to gain international credibility or sympathy.

I hope they want genuine peace though. A pacifist president might do this country well in the future.
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.