![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: sarah palin?
Quote:
Quote:
For me - it's a bit of both. Quote:
I don't know if I'd call what's being sown in her wake as "excitement". Incitement possibly - stirring up of racially based, negative stereotypes possibly, Incoherent, rambling, inaccurate statements - definitely. I mean - judging the reports from her campaign stops - could you really be in there and walk out feeling excited, lifted and positive about the future?
__________________
Doesn't information itself have a liberal bias? - S. Colbert Last edited by chuck; 10-26-2008 at 07:28 PM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: sarah palin?
I guess until someone from the GOP really comes out and calls her on the bullshit - she's going to be able to keep going. And that's not going to happen during the next couple of weeks. I'm amazed that some of the noises about the rift between her and McCain are even getting out. Just examples of how erratic the McCain-Palin ticket is. But after the election - there might come a reckoning - and I would hope that those who really believe in conservative values (small govt, less taxes, less foreign intervention) actually step up.
Reading Sullivan, who's a conservative, he talks of this internal war - and has a hope for the future of the conservative movement in the US. As a political way of thinking the McCain-Palin-GW Bush-Rove ideology is far removed from traditional conservatism. (As I understand it anyway.) I think Palin is the obligatory result of the last 8 years of Rove-led/O'Reilly-managed/Fox spun bile. It's only natural for her to appeal the base level responses of the electorate - after all, that's what Rove appealed to and who Fox speaks too. If you've watched any of O'Reilly's rants over the years - as dirty and as sordid as that might make you feel - you can understand how those screaming "socialist", "communist", "kill him" feel justified. This isn't a culture war - it's a thinking war. And war is not even the right word for it. It's a battle over the discourse - not the content of the discourse - but how we even go about discussing the content. Possibly a little too post-modern and meta for most - but hugely important. I think the polls are showing that - they're so random and all over the place - and in part I think that's because so much polling takes place now, a certain percentage of those polled play the game. No-one really knows what those polls mean - and do people even believe the polls, or place much faith in them. Palin and those who buy into her discourse are frustrating to me on a personal level. But those who are thinking - on both sides of whatever issue is at hand - well they need to be looked out for and listened too. Case in point: http://www.conservativesforchange.com/
__________________
Doesn't information itself have a liberal bias? - S. Colbert Last edited by chuck; 10-26-2008 at 07:22 PM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: sarah palin?
Quote:
![]() You people are on fire tonight!
__________________
Download all my remixes Last edited by Sean; 10-27-2008 at 02:35 AM. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: sarah palin?
Palin is going to be in some trouble when she gets back to Alaska. She's rubbed republicans the wrong way, as with democrats, and with the legion of cronies she's employed coming out into the light, there will definitely be some very tough moments ahead for Governor Palin.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: sarah palin?
I think Palin's career is over. If the democrats manage to get a filibuster-proof majority in the senate and continue gaining in the House, the conservative movement will likely have to come back to the center from the right. When these seats are safe for their demographic region, neither democrats or conservatives have to worry much about being challenged bysomeone from the other aisle. Rather, their competition comes from their own flanks so it encourages the lefties to stay on the left and the righties to stay on the right. Throw that into chaos and you have, now, an entire party that has to re-examine their message and their focus. This election is largely a verdict that the right has failed.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: sarah palin?
i think it's too soon to call that. call it having a bush in office for more than half my life but the way i see it republicans have a child-like tenacity and baselessness that wont stop them from plumbing the depths of pathos and division at every opportunuity to get what they want. i dont say democrats are free of this, but they def. stop short of the demagoguery we've seen this decade.
i'd say right now theyre simply confused. they dont have the right kind of rhetoric against his type that can sink him yet. he's like a rookie pitcher unleashed into the world series who gets the best men out because no one has seen his style to know how to swing against it. it'll only take time to figure out the angles of attack and form the unified front again. unless he's an unmitigated success they will definitely construe him as a major disappointment and know how to word it right this time. they may be fumbling too late to scare everyone away from him, but this just means they have 4 years to do it now. ok this next bit is unrelated but gambit sent this to me and it made me lol: http://www.cnnbcvideo.com/index.html...523119-z_nbbwx |
| Post Reply |
|
|