Re: Underworld wiki
Yeah, wasn't there talk of creating our very own dirty.org wiki (well, darktrain.org, I guess)? I'd fully support this, as we could do whatever we want and be as detailed as we like.
The problem with our presence on Wikipedia is that it is strictly encyclopedic, which limits us to things deemed 'notable', like TheBang said (and all sorts of other silly guidelines/restrictions).
Clearly what we need is something more than that: a comprehensive resource to all things Underworld.
|