![]() |
|
|
|
#132
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Burial
Quote:
![]() Quote:
|
|
#133
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Burial
not quite done. what genre would you file Various Production under?
maybe i do have too narrow a definition of dubstep. i'm unsure now, but it's something i want to explore.
__________________
triple-glazed and pebble-dashed |
|
#134
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Burial
i don't know. trip-hop? :P
a few tracks sound like grime--that "Hater" instrumental has been versioned and remixed by a number of grime artists. it makes sense, given the way it sounds. |
|
#135
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Burial
I've always sort of grouped Various Production into the whole 'dubstep' category / scene... but sort of in the way that Massive Attack & Tricky were 'trip hop' - yet at the same time very much not
I think as time has progressed, there was this really emphatic sense that you had to category each style of music within a box... not only to 'make it easy' to find specific sounds you'd want (as someone purchasing music) but also to give a sense of unique identity within each genre. Like, the producer now has a name/craft to identify with. (like, "I work with wooden furniture so I must be a carpenter") but the only problem is - the categories got way way way way too specific, while musicians simultaneously started crossing genres (there's a clever quote that David Byrne said about this on "Sessions @ West 54th" a while back, but I forget it - I think I have that show recorded somewhere...) and genre's - in general - have become pretty pointless. Like, how would you classify someone like Sebastian, Justice, or Digitalism? I've heard each of them described as "electro"... but they sound remarkedly different than to say - Tiefschwarz, Mylo, Two Lone Swordsmen, or even The Egyptian Lover & Afrika Bambaataa - who have also been classified as "electro" |
|
#136
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Burial
i think the only reason Various Production get grouped with dubstep is becasue dubstep gets name-dropped for no reason whenever critics write about them. but i agree, the micro-genre labels have become increasingly pointless, partly because it seems people are getting tired of it, and partly because the music itself doesn't seem to care too much. today there's a certain idea of "dubstep", "minimal", etc, but i think the names only stick because of a few broad musical qualities (low-end, crunchiness, etc) and the scenes that form around them. this can only be a good thing IMO
|
|
#137
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Burial
Various are less dubstep to you than Burial? I completely disagree. alright, Various obv. do many diff. genres but they've also done tunes that are much closer to the sound of dubstep than Burial. guess what? Dubstep dj's vibe off/play Various cuts! i guess i would be OK with defining some songs of Burial's as dubstep but mostly his albums sound like Ambient albums that are influenced by 2step, dub and dnb. It's not that different to The Orb's first couple albums except when the Orb were making those records, the pillaged genres were diff; DnB and 2step had yet to happen so they took elements from other sources. if you're willing to say Various are not a dubstep artist for some of their songs being clearly outside the genre, why don't you make that distinction for Burial?
btw, i wouldn't describe Various to someone or label/file Various under Dubstep either. while they've made some Dubstep tunes, they're not so easily categorized. same as Burial in my book.
__________________
triple-glazed and pebble-dashed |
|
#139
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Burial
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#140
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Burial
certainly Burial isn't part of the Dubstep scene. he's going through great lengths to not be seen as coming from any camp. i think you are making a distinction between Burial and Various because you think Various is cheesy while Burial has cred. Various and Burial are both on the periphery of Dubstep. Neither deserves to be labelled Dubstep.
If you asked Burial what kind of music he makes do you think he'd say Dubstep?
__________________
triple-glazed and pebble-dashed |
| Post Reply |
|
|