Now playing on dirty.radio: Loading...

  Dirty Forums > underworld.
Register FAQ Community Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 06-18-2006, 11:23 AM
big screen satellite
Still Number 1
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mon Calimari
Posts: 3,214
Re: Underworld wiki
one thing i have noticed, and think we should avoid, is listing items with '???' following them

and also the 'unconfirmed' elements...

i believe that we should not post any singles or formats or releases that we have no proof of existence, including the 'Spoonman' promo, which no one has seen, the Cowgirl UK White vinyl etc,. and there are a few more.

We should only be listing stuff on the Wiki that do actually exist and can be verified by the person editing the page.

I know my own website has some areas with speculative releases, but thats not an open source for editing, this is and as such it should contain 'true' release, and not speculation, otherwise we will see more 'releases' up for deletion...

and also we perhaps need to be a little more accurate in our notetaions, rather than speculating where releases came from who has them how they got there, etc. after all we want this to be an accurate encyclopdia - speculation and conjecture should be posted elsewhere...

Mattval1
__________________
i will not be confused (with another FAN)
https://bigscreensatellite.borndirty.org

Last edited by big screen satellite; 06-18-2006 at 11:27 AM.
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.