will everyone just stop... - Page 2

jose m · #11 06-05-2006, 04:35 AM

this quality discussion is as old as recorded music,get over it ! its like expecting nike to design their trainers bearing in mind people with bunyons.

big screen satellite · #12 06-05-2006, 04:37 AM

this is still the no moaning thread...

don't bring yer bitrate grips in here... if ya wanna moan about the recordings go to the moaning forums...

the mongoose · #13 06-05-2006, 04:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by big screen satellite

will everyone just stop complaining ...and moaning

no.....and no.

the mongoose · #14 06-05-2006, 05:07 AM

Ok then, what bitrate will we actually be entitled to moan at?

What to you is acceptable...(kinda hard asking a guy who'd spend $80 for a piece of gum Karl chewed in 1998 though)

patrick · #15 06-05-2006, 05:12 AM

i don't see why people with valid concerns/arguements get flamed. if everyone took everything that they were given without questioning it, the world would be a far worse place...

it is a little disapointing that it got shifted down from 192 to 160 instead of up from 192 to 256.

stimpee · #16 06-05-2006, 05:16 AM

Anymore threads that get started to moan about the fact that the mp3s are 160kbps/48khz instead of 192kbps/44.1khz will be merged into the RR3 sticky thread along with all the other moaning.

In the past, some Underworldlive.com releases have been wrongly encoded and then re-released later giving users the ability to re-download them. If this is one such mistake then I'm sure UW/management know about it and will rectify it.

lloyd · #17 06-05-2006, 05:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patrick

i don't see why people with valid concerns/arguements get flamed. if everyone took everything that they were given without questioning it, the world would be a far worse place...

Good to know that 320kbps mp3s stop the Iraq war.

BeautifulBurnout · #18 06-05-2006, 05:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patrick

i don't see why people with valid concerns/arguements get flamed. if everyone took everything that they were given without questioning it, the world would be a far worse place...

As I said in the main thread. It is not about people having valid concerns and arguments. I took on board his argument, although I don't happen to agree with it. The reason why I flamed Mongoose (if indeed I did) is because he kept on and on and on about it. 8 posts out of his last 10 have been a whine about either this download or the previews for it. Enough moaning already. We get the point.

big screen satellite · #19 06-05-2006, 05:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patrick

i don't see why people with valid concerns/arguements get flamed. if everyone took everything that they were given without questioning it, the world would be a far worse place...

it is a little disapointing that it got shifted down from 192 to 160 instead of up from 192 to 256.

there is a difference between 'slightly disappointing' and what has been said by some people about this, though...

and its not just this... people have been moaning since last year about various elements of the UW output and its, like i said, pretty embarassing

there are ways to voice concerns and 'disappointments' but to 'flame' the band is just as bad, imo.

seriously though the bitrate thing - its not that big a deal is it really?

the mongoose · #20 06-05-2006, 05:24 AM

Guess we have no choice but not complain........try to start a valid thread about this one particular topic......take the time to convey your thoughts without just typing "GGGGRRRR FUCK FUCK FUCK" (which is what you REALLY want to do)........and watch (IMO) the valid thread disappear.

No free speech or opinions or complaints.....just give us your credit cards and take it up the pooper.

Guess this post will disappear too right?