Underworld SACDs would be neat.

[bryantm3]

Originally Posted by patrick

99% of stereos can't tell the difference between cds and these anyways, cd resolution is high enough for the masses and you'd need thousands of dollars to hear 96000hz recording rate (overkill) or 24 bit sample rates (good but not super necessary)

it's also less processed than CDs. it takes around 9 steps of conversion to make a cd while it only takes 3 for SACD. if you've heard an SACD you'll hear the difference. i have an SACD of peter gabriel's first album and his most recent, 'up', and even in stereo, these versions are so much better than the originals you won't even believe it. and they're not remixed for surround, either! (SACD stereo) and guess how much my speakers cost? $500 for both.