![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FIFA World Cup 2010
cured's explanation makes the most sense but wouldn't the team with the best fitness win if it came down to that? it seems like it would be pretty easy to allow for a larger team and more substitutions. why not let a player come back on the field?
what was the issue with the golden goal? why didn't it work?
__________________
triple-glazed and pebble-dashed |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FIFA World Cup 2010
Quote:
Draws are not a bad thing. It's a good way for a David (Algeria) to take some bragging rights away from a Goliath (England). If Goliath isn't good enough to beat David in regulation, just give them both a point and have them move on. In today's case, a draw for England could very well be their death knell. Just wait to you see what the tabloids have to say about it. Don't worry, though, draws will be a thing of the past after next Friday. When that second round starts, you'll get overtime and, if that doesn't settle it, penalty kicks. It all evens out. I've been watching the World Cup since 1994 and the best teams generally always manage to escape out of their group since there are 3 games to be played. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FIFA World Cup 2010
Quote:
replays? again - it's about the world cup being intrisically the same game that my son plays in his sunday league - controlled and decided by the same set of officials... as cured knows - 'it all evens out'
__________________
uw0761 ![]() nutts2020 |
| Post Reply |
|
|