Now playing on dirty.radio: Loading...

  Dirty Forums > world.
Register FAQ Community Today's Posts Search

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 02-12-2010, 06:16 PM
Eikman
a life less extraordinary
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: beerlin
Posts: 959
Re: Iranian uranium
are you a moron?
__________________

  #42  
Old 02-12-2010, 06:19 PM
bas_I_am
vision
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: living on a psychedelic pig farm
Posts: 514
Re: Iranian uranium
fucking racist
  #43  
Old 02-12-2010, 06:22 PM
Eikman
a life less extraordinary
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: beerlin
Posts: 959
Re: Iranian uranium
yeah right. quod erat demonstrandum.

also: i'm not fucking racists. do you?
__________________


Last edited by Eikman; 02-12-2010 at 06:24 PM.
  #44  
Old 02-12-2010, 06:26 PM
Strangelet
rico suave
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lost in a romance
Posts: 815
Re: Iranian uranium
Quote:
Originally Posted by bas_I_am View Post
Yeah nice website. I did a "CNTRL + F" and looked for the words "napalm" or "obliterate", the craziest thing... nothing popped up.
__________________
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it."

- Mark Twain

  #45  
Old 02-12-2010, 06:33 PM
bas_I_am
vision
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: living on a psychedelic pig farm
Posts: 514
Re: Iranian uranium
http://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journ....1eshkoli.html
http://baltimore.indymedia.org/newsw...5200/index.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration
  #46  
Old 02-12-2010, 06:39 PM
Eikman
a life less extraordinary
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: beerlin
Posts: 959
Re: Iranian uranium
providing links (some of which are only accessible via an institutional login....which I, in this case, actually have) to an article doesn't prove your point. besides, neither does any of them relate to the topic at hand.

take your agenda out somewhere else.
__________________

  #47  
Old 02-13-2010, 02:56 AM
//\/\/
slogging it out
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: north of centre
Posts: 1,906
Re: Iranian uranium
bas, you're confusing the shit out of us now; first it's 'israel', then it's 'zionists' - what about non-zionist israelis? and non-jewish isrealis?
__________________
uw0761
nutts2020
  #48  
Old 02-13-2010, 08:30 AM
bas_I_am
vision
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: living on a psychedelic pig farm
Posts: 514
Re: Iranian uranium
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eikman View Post
providing links (some of which are only accessible via an institutional login....which I, in this case, actually have) to an article doesn't prove your point. besides, neither does any of them relate to the topic at hand.
They relate completely.

You are to stupid to understand.
  #49  
Old 02-13-2010, 09:02 AM
Eikman
a life less extraordinary
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: beerlin
Posts: 959
Re: Iranian uranium
probably because i don't speak bullshit.
__________________

  #50  
Old 02-13-2010, 09:23 AM
bas_I_am
vision
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: living on a psychedelic pig farm
Posts: 514
Re: Iranian uranium
Quote:
Originally Posted by //\/\/ View Post
bas, you're confusing the shit out of us now; first it's 'israel', then it's 'zionists' - what about non-zionist israelis? and non-jewish isrealis?
No, it is always Israel/Zion.

A non-zionist israeli is intent on righting the wrongs of his ancestors.

Non-jewish isrealis? it depends. . . are they zionists?

Simply put, a Zionist believes that being of a particular religious faith gives them claim to land that belongs to someone else. They also believe it is their right to take that land by "any means" because it was given them by God!

Remove the word "Zionist" from the above statement. . .

"Simply put, a [blank] believes that being of a particular religious faith gives them claim to land that belongs to someone else. They also believe it is their right to take that land by 'any means' because it was given them by God!"

Any person with a shred of humanity and compassion, must admit "'blankism' must be stopped!!! We must stand up for the rights of the oppressed!!!"

Now, put the word 'Zionism' back in. . . and someone says " 'Zionism' must be stopped!!! We must stand up for the rights of the oppressed!!!"

People rear up on their heals and say "wait a second!!! thats anti-semetic!!!"

Huh??? Seriously? how can that be? How can a belief be detested in one context, yet defended in another. . . Simply by a subjective alteration?

Please. . . This is utterly irrational!
You guys are bright, I'm open minded. . . Someone explain this to me!

Don't insult me and call me an extremist or a moron.

Now a greater question comes to the forefront. How could such a fallacy come to carry such immense weight in today's world affairs. So much so that it is possibly the one issue that could bring about complete and total annihlation of the the human race, that is Nuclear War (The initial context of this thread, am I wrong???)

It doesn't take much effort realize how it happened.

At the end of World War I, a powerful group of European Zionist's used financial leverage to exploit political confusion as a means to accelerate the manifestation of their goal. Furthermore, leading upto World War II, they played the ascent of the Nazi party and its evil apparatus as a gambit that would ultimately turn western opinion in their favor.

THIS IS BY NO MEANS AN APOLOGY FOR NAZIS! NOR IS IT A CONTENTION THAT ZIONISM IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE HOLOCAUST.

Not at all. It is simply an accurate account of history.

Again, the sad thing is, to bring this to the attention of people, runs the risk of being branded an anti-semite.

For example, when Eikman snidely says "take your agenda somewhere else" he is implying to you that I am anti-semetic. And that you will write me off as some neo-nazi lunatic and not investigate on your own.

Its about justice.

Zionism is evil. . . Just as the Spanish Inquisition was evil.

Would you brand me a lunatic for believing the Spanish Inquisition was evil.

Evil is simply that. . . Evil

Again. . . Don't call me an extremist or a moron. Or ask me rhetorical questions in the hopes of painting me into a contradiction.

Explain to me where I am wrong in my understanding of history.
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.