|
Re: Underworld wiki
one thing i have noticed, and think we should avoid, is listing items with '???' following them
and also the 'unconfirmed' elements...
i believe that we should not post any singles or formats or releases that we have no proof of existence, including the 'Spoonman' promo, which no one has seen, the Cowgirl UK White vinyl etc,. and there are a few more.
We should only be listing stuff on the Wiki that do actually exist and can be verified by the person editing the page.
I know my own website has some areas with speculative releases, but thats not an open source for editing, this is and as such it should contain 'true' release, and not speculation, otherwise we will see more 'releases' up for deletion...
and also we perhaps need to be a little more accurate in our notetaions, rather than speculating where releases came from who has them how they got there, etc. after all we want this to be an accurate encyclopdia - speculation and conjecture should be posted elsewhere...
Mattval1
Last edited by big screen satellite; 06-18-2006 at 11:27 AM.
|