is there anyone else who is pro-life AND pro-gay rights, or is it just me? - Page 14

Sean · #**131** 07-02-2009, 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strangelet

You are right. Sean and Deckard are more respectful and articulate. Which is why I hold the amount of respect I do for them.

Well almost every time I post, I have to remind myself of how much more informative debates Deckard participates in turn out being than they've been when I get all pissy, so I credit him. But my natural tendency is definitely to be pissy. For the most part, I have to sit and breath deeply for a little while before replying to stuff - especially posts like that last analogy Myrrh offered up involving my wife...

dubman · #**132** 07-02-2009, 05:29 PM

why do you take that personally?
jsut because he doesnt frame his posts like a complete retard doesnt mean he should eb taken with a straight face either. dude is a joke.
is it really so low to acknowledge that some things go nowhere and just resort to basic ridicule for being such a crass twit?

jOHN rODRIGUEZ · #**133** 07-02-2009, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dubman

is it really so low to acknowledge that some things go nowhere and just resort to basic ridicule for being such a crass twit?

And here we go folks...

stimpee · #**134** 07-03-2009, 08:44 AM

dubman/john: go grab your handbags and duel outside of this thread

jOHN rODRIGUEZ · #**135** 07-03-2009, 10:40 AM

Have yet to be shown where anything I've said has not made sense or not so.

I'd love to see anyone who has made those accusations prove it to be so. Yous got nothing...

Come now, try to show me and I'll show how yous're wrong again. But don't get upset when proved wrong. Again.

dubman · #**136** 07-04-2009, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stimpee

dubman/john: go grab your handbags and duel outside of this thread

fuck off, you

jOHN rODRIGUEZ · #**137** 07-04-2009, 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dubman

fuck off, you

(this should appear in italicks, but those in control are nazi-ish without even knowing it)

Everyone is peeled to screen awaiting stimpee's, "NO WIRE HANGERS!" moment on du(m)bman/bitch.

(end italics)

bryantm3 · #**138** 07-04-2009, 01:19 PM

i vote that the thread starter should have the ability to lock their own threads when they degenerate into off-topic rants.

jOHN rODRIGUEZ · #**139** 07-04-2009, 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bryantm3

i vote that the thread starter should have the ability to lock their own threads when they degenerate into off-topic rants.

Well, if you get that power, let us all hope you are able to go back and follow and recall/remember who started the off-topic rants.

Don't look at me.

As well as, the thread starter, should answer questions from the lost flock(

) who are trying to clarify what the topic is about, if he has the balls to do so. That would be you.

cacophony · #**140** 07-04-2009, 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bryantm3

i vote that the thread starter should have the ability to lock their own threads when they degenerate into off-topic rants.

just be zen about it and let it flow where it goes. if you started a conversation at a party and it ended up degenerating into a rant, you wouldn't be able to lock people's mouths.

unless this was an episode of the twilight zone.

and i hope it's not.