![]() |
|
|
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ring Road... next single...(?)
Quote:
__________________
triple-glazed and pebble-dashed |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ring Road... next single...(?)
Quote:
![]() I regularly download 5-10 mixes a week from hybridized.org or Mixdepot.com, and yes, i agree with you that whilemany remixes are quite different from the originals, there are still most often more than "a few samples" or "sprinkles" left intact. Admittedly, most of the mixes i enjoy are progressive, electro or breaks sets, if that makes any difference. but when i know the original tune, i can recognize it's essence in the remix. So, i don't think i'm being blind to remix culture, because it's not just junking a vocal on a new composition. Take most of the other UW remixes we've had by other artists since Beaucoup Fish, ten years ago till today: Most of them had quite recognizeable parts of the original in addition to the vocal...and still managed to be unique creations of the remixer. Yes, the days of an extended mix where a lil beat or EQ was tweaked are gone. But i'd like to think that there are clever(er) producers who can work with the original tracks in a new way, rather than what LL and others are apparently doing, taking their own song and pasting a vocal on top. That seems to me a cop-out and a bit of a hanging on the coat-tails of the more famous UW to get your record played or sold. For right or for wrong.
__________________
Believe in Billy Records |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ring Road... next single...(?)
Underworld are using Laidback Luke (and other remixers) solid reputation to sell copies, not the other way around. It's UW who are riding the coattails of the remixers. Wighnomy/Pete Heller/Huntemann et.al were chosen because they were/are very popular with dj's. Pete Heller didn't ask to have a remix on the single so he could take some of UW's glory. UW, or their management, asked Heller (and Laidback Luke) because they liked their work and thought it would sell copies. You've got this all backwards. BTW, all of those mixers i mentioned created mixes that had little or nothing to do with the original songs other than the vocal track.
__________________
triple-glazed and pebble-dashed |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ring Road... next single...(?)
the singles with remixes are aimed at Dj's, not whining retards on a message board. if you're a DJ and you don't know Laidback Luke, you don't know your history. Laidback Luke was a huge name in techno at the end of the 90s.
saying he's unknown to 99% of the populace is being willfully ignorant of the target audience for this particular remix/release.
__________________
triple-glazed and pebble-dashed |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ring Road... next single...(?)
Is it er...not coz Karlos/Ricko/Daz like said person and know they may do a semi decent job? Why not ask Simian who were meant to tour with UW, Errors or Thom York seeing UW are meant to be touring with them. They wouldn't ask me
__________________
What's a signature? |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ring Road... next single...(?)
All this does not make it a good remix. I know of Laidback Luke. I already expressed my opinion. Whatever. Its a bad remix. Thats that. In fact, this is one of the worst official Underworld remixes I've ever heard. Apologies to the Underworld guys and Steve Hall but this is a stinker. I hope it does well in the clubs but it does nothing for the reputation of Underworld and it wont sell any albums.
__________________
UW0764 || Professor: "Underworld have never failed to disappoint me" || Yannick changed my avatar picture. |
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Ring Road... next single...(?)
Quote:
to almost all of the remixes they did for other artists in the mid 90's... you can barely tell what happened to the original sounds.. from most of the mixes they put out (ie one dove, drum club, bjork, everything but the girl, eagles prey, etc).. (by the way, i'm a big fan of most of those though), i can't really stand the originals for most of them... later -1 Last edited by negative1; 04-10-2008 at 05:02 PM. |
| Post Reply |
|
|