Now playing on dirty.radio: Loading... |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Star Trek XI
This is the 9th movie right? So it should be IX?
To be honest I don't like the idea of Kirk being played by someone else - how many of Shatner's personal acting quirks and mannerisms have been integrated into our perception of that character?? But it's got Simon Pegg and John Cho in it so I guess I have to see it... |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Star Trek XI
Nope, it's the 11th of the series. First 6 were numbered and starred the original crew. 7 - 10 featured the Next Generation cast and didn't carry a number.
They're just calling this one Star Trek, right? Doesn't make sense to call it XI since the plot predates all the rest. i guess.
__________________
Believe in Billy Records |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Star Trek XI
Guess I missed two of them (goes to wikipedia) yep, only saw two of the ones with the TNG crew. Pretty glad that they never made with any of the Enterprise/Voyager crews because they really lost the plot at that point. The way I see it Star Trek is really meant to be kind of cornball and actor-driven (as opposed to character-driven)
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Star Trek XI
It's still scoring 100% over at Rotten Tomatoes with 16 reviews in so far so the signs are definitely look good. Only 2 reviews so far over at Metacritic but both of them give it full marks too
|
Post Reply |
|
|