![]() |
|
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
talk talk and underworld
in listening to this album, and looking back at
underworlds career...i'm reminded of another group i like 'talk talk'...although their styles couldn't be anymore different it is interesting to see what happened.. talk talk started out with some acclaimed albums, and some niche following, with some commercial success for their first few albums...yeah, they had singles, and some club hits.. but it all erupted into a huge mess, when they hit it big with 'its my life'.....which haunted them from then on.... unlike underworld though, they were not that much of a live band, and only toured sparsely. anyways, they later added another unnoffical member to their team, who ended up contributing greatly.....they also had amazing artwork, and were very consistent in the image they presented.. their sound was instantly recognizable (mostly), and their production values were very high... they then went on to have more commercial success although their singles weren't really accessible, (sound familiar?)....they also decided to make music that was more experimental and not as commercial.. of course their studio didn't like that, and there were all kinds of disputes (there was a remix album released without their approval)... their last 3 albums were probably the furthest things released that could even be considered 'commercial'...and they eventually broke up, and the led singer went on to form his own solo projects (mark hollis).... anyways, i know underworld hasn't reached that point.....but i'm wondering if this album is a reaction to the earlier 'accessibility' of their previous works, and now that they're independent and can explore more 'artistic' leanings.. of course, i could just be imagining things... more info : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk_Talk later -1 |
|
|