![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Progressive Classics 1994-1996, 134Bpm+
I'm sorry, that's horrid.
130 BPM maybe 125 BPM? Shouldawouldacoulda . . . Per below: Good to hear your reasoning, I thought maybe you were all hopped up on something and didn't know any better at the time.
__________________
8=====)~~(=====8
Last edited by jOHN rODRIGUEZ; 02-28-2010 at 11:16 AM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Progressive Classics 1994-1996, 134Bpm+
haha, nice. I hear ya for sure. There was a time for this bpm for me... and it was long ago. I use this mix for running, and not much else. The tunes, though, are good, and have movement and atmosphere. They are just really dated; but that was the point though.
__________________
www.soundcloud.com/marshall_watson |
| Post Reply |
|
|