Tokyo Tracklisting?

[TheBang]

I think Dirty0900 was being facetious (albeit technically correct).

Obviously, Born Slippy NUXX would be the only one done like that, as it had an actual release as 2003.

[stimpee]

Born Slippy .NUXX 2003 is the title, not 96. Until they rejig it again and remove alter the extra piano that helps us identify it it will be called 2003 im sure. i've not paid that much attention to the tracklisting because theyre already trackmarked on the CD and i listen as one anyway. still, nice to know you boys are being anally retentive enough to get it right. i'll probably do the same when i get back to NL.

[big screen satellite]

Originally Posted by stimpee

Born Slippy .NUXX 2003 is the title, not 96. Until they rejig it again and remove alter the extra piano that helps us identify it it will be called 2003 im sure. i've not paid that much attention to the tracklisting because theyre already trackmarked on the CD and i listen as one anyway. still, nice to know you boys are being anally retentive enough to get it right. i'll probably do the same when i get back to NL.

yeah they are being totally AR... even i'm not that bad...

Basically the track in question is simply known as 'Born Slippy NUXX' (i.e. the vocal version), whether it has the 2003 mix piano or not on it makes no difference really, because when its played live like almost all the tracks played live it has elements of other mixes, versions, and lyrics within it... you seriously could go on and name tracks like this: 'King of Snake with some Moaner lyrics, and a sample of Mmm Skyscaper '05' Darren Price Remix Version 2' - its just tooooo anal...

Each to their own at home on their own mp3 players, but i think for points of reference (i.e. on the wiki, internet,) tracks should be labelled as they are known, Born Slippy NUXX, or as they appear on officially released materials or sources. I've never been keen on fan labelling of unknown tracks either...

'interlude 1' or 'unknown track 1' is fine, but trying to name a track based upon the sound of the lyrics or some other variation just lends to further confusion....

not every new bit of music is a new track, when a guitar band comes on to play live and the bassist strumms his strings a few times before the first song starts, fans don't think 'ohh' that three second interlude is a new song, and neither should we... alot of these interludes are just snippets of sounds and don't always require an explanation or name... (i know UW do produce music to fill space, but to me, unless its officially named, just leave it as unknown)

just my 2x$...

keep up the good anal work though....