![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: producing tunes...but which software?!
I haven't used it myself but I've head some good things about Mackie's Traktion. Which is basically a sequencer in the cubase sense (rather than a tracker) but only costs about $150
link Myself I use Cubase SL 2, of which i bought second hand for about 150 Euro, so that's not too bad either. I use this in conjunction with a Creamware Scope system, some VSTi's (Battery, Albino 2, ImpOscar) and a Nord Rack II.
__________________
"I have always LOVED Underworld" - Sir Elton John Last edited by King of Snake; 03-18-2006 at 04:41 AM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: producing tunes...but which software?!
Quote:
__________________
Scratch my back in rhythm... |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: producing tunes...but which software?!
well I don't use it but yes, ReWire into Cubase should work perfectly. I used to ReWire ReBirth into Cubase VST all the time.
__________________
"I have always LOVED Underworld" - Sir Elton John |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: producing tunes...but which software?!
I don't really care for Reason any more. Live, and Battery 2. Battery 2 is so worth the money.
__________________
everybody makes mistakes...but i feel alright when i come undone |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: producing tunes...but which software?!
Once you Rewire Reason into a DAW like Cubase or Live5, Reason becomes a much better piece of software. All of Reason's modules are adequately made but the stand-alone program's sound engine is so crappy that at first listen you'd be convinced that Battery or Reaktor is way better. But once you route the audio into Cubase and let Cubase handle the signal processing, the sound quality makes a noticeable jump.
In all, I'm very happy that I own the software packages that I do (Reason, Cubase, Reaktor 5, Battery 2, Live5) and I recommend buying what you can, the more the merrier. I'm also happy with my choice to purchase Live5 after already buying Cubase; even though Cubase has better sound quality (IMHO), Live5 is easier to write and compose in and since I do a broad mix of engineering, split 50/50 between organic recording and playing and sequencing, each DAW has its place in my arsenal and paradigms towards music. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: producing tunes...but which software?!
I use Ableton Live to produce music. I find it very intuitive. The funny thing is, that I can create my tracks with only a sh101, MS2000 and drum (and loop)samples. No need for a rompler or something. I even have limited my gear. Anyone interested in a sequential circuits multitrak?
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: producing tunes...but which software?!
Quote:
I've been playing with borrowed copies of Live and Reason to see if I want to drop the cash on them. They're both worthy and will be purchased in the near future. I'm just trying to decide which to get first.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: producing tunes...but which software?!
Q: has anyone used Cakewalk Plasma? i've used its samples and loops, but found the interface difficult. Acid seems much friendlier. And also, how's the demo for Ableton? Is it one of these limited time demos or one with minimal capabilities? i'd rather the latter just for fooling around...hatew it when freeware expires
__________________
Believe in Billy Records |
| Post Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|