![]() |
|
|
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith...
oh man... i know about that scene with the missile droids. i retract my statement earlier about the stupidist part... that is for SURE the worst... and most specifically the part where obi wan tells r2d2 how to kill them. they are just focused on the droid's stupid fight for about a minute... GOD DAMN IT... i was so angry
|
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith...
Quote:
one reason for these: action figures
__________________
i will not be confused (with another FAN) https://bigscreensatellite.borndirty.org |
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith...
Quote:
), but I just have such a hard time getting immersed in the new ones because even the people who made it didn't take it seriously and are constantly winking at me from behind the screen with their goofy little droids saying "uh-oh" and aliens stepping in poo.That's what's so good about Empire Strikes Back, because there you had a director who actually took the universe of the movie seriously. He says in one of the interviews on the dvd edition something like "I felt it (the movie) needed humour, but yet I couldn't have gags, I felt like it needed romance, but it couldn't have a lot of kissing etc". George Lucas applies the opposite logic, diluting what is supposed to be an epic story of war and loss of freedom with stupid gags and smoochie love scenes. I can't even begin to imagine how much this movie would improve if you would just cut all the bad jokes out. Quote:
Quote:
You don't have to compare them to the old Star Wars movies to bash them either, you can just compare it with Lord of the Rings for a present day example of big-budget epic fantasy filmmaking done right. Quote:
), that doesn't mean it's ok to just forget about that and focus on more CG instead.
|
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith...
^ KOS i agree with you on almost every count...LOTR trilogy is a masterpiece for one..., and I do think that GL did get lazy or reliant upon CGI, but there is no denying that the PT set of movies have been a great success...
even I cringe at the acting, which i think is the worst part of the PT...little Annie, Ewan, Hayden...even Palpatine overacts a bit too much in ROTS...and yes these elements do spoil the movie to a certain degree, but i think i try and let these gloss over...there are a lot more godawful bits in the PT than any of the OT...the hills are alive scene...but hey i accept that GL hasn't learnt from his lack of scriptwriting ability and dialogue skills and accept the movies as they are...i like the PT as its part of the complete Star Wars Saga...even i appreciate teh finer qualities of the OT...but i have to defend the fact that GL went back and made the PT... and there are plently of shite movies at the top of the BO takings chart..Titanic being the biggest one...and you can blame GL for almost all of these movies too...after all, over 60 of the top 100 grossing movies of all time were made using IML technology (George's CGI dept.) or by WETA (a company set up by Peter Jackson, inspired by ILM - to assist in the LOTR trilogy)...GL and Star Wars have a lot to answer for...
__________________
i will not be confused (with another FAN) https://bigscreensatellite.borndirty.org |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith...
They have been succesfull, but I think the success is mostly based on the popularity of the originals and the franchise as a whole, and the special effects. And I guess there are a whole lot of devote Star Wars fans who are willing to accept anythin Lucas does and think it's great just because it's Star Wars. Don't get me wrong, I love Star Wars and I did enjoy the prequels to a certain degree because it is Star Wars and they do have their place in the saga. It's just that they could have and should have done a whole lot better and when I'm watching these films there's this voice in my head that keeps telling me "come on, you can try to enjoy it but deep inside you know it's crap!"
![]() Quote:
|
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith...
Quote:
and how come the death star was pretty-well on the way to being built, only to take another 18 years or so? union problems or something?
__________________
uw0761 ![]() nutts2020 |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith...
Hahaha, good question //\/\/.
Although ROTS was far away the best movie of the prequels, it was still lame. However, there was a definate improvement in the acting, whether or not you discerning viewers want to acknowledge it. Haydn was more natural, and Ewan's performance made his character a lot more easy to sympathize with this time around. My biggest gripe was with Palpatine. He was completely unnatural before his transformation, and was the biggest pile of shit afterwards. If I was Anakin, I would woken the fuck up. "Hey, I'll do your bidding now." "GOOOOOOD!!!" "Uhm... why are you talking like Bela Legosi?" "Because... you. Have joined. THE DAAAARK SIIIIDE." "Hey, for real. Stop talking like a vampire. You're making me feel a bit strange." "GOOOOOOD!!!" "Whatever man. I'm going back to the force. I liked Mace Windu a lot more than you, and he's been on my shit list since day one. How am I going to take you out in public? You're acting like an idiot, and what's this about killing kids again?" |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith...
Quote:
|
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith...
Quote:
well it wasn't bad for a three movie set filmed back to back...it was pretty epic - and did win 11 oscars...(i count the oscars given to ROTK - for all three movies)...
__________________
i will not be confused (with another FAN) https://bigscreensatellite.borndirty.org |
| Post Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|