Now playing on dirty.radio: Loading...

  Dirty Forums > underworld.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old 10-25-2006, 12:28 PM
holden
collateral damage
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: foothills of the front range
Posts: 2,939
Send a message via MSN to holden
Re: Underworld rejected from ProgArchives
Quote:
Originally Posted by smack416
But I don't believe that "progressive" has ever meant new as it relates to music. ie, "the term "progressive" typically refers to the structure of a track which occur incrementally."
Oh, but it did! Problem is, there are at least two "progressive" prefixes- that which is usually applied to the genre (the prog-rock label), as indicative of experimental music or that which carries sophistication and style not usually found in mainstream rock, and then there is the "progressive" you're describing, smack416, for "progressive trance", "progressive house", etc, that's specific to a song structure.

I'd propose we forget the labels and connotations of the word Prog. That gets us into arguments about genres and comparisons to other bands.

Question is simple: did Underworld's music make an impact on the musical landscape? Were they a step ahead of the rest? I'd argue that the certainly were in the Dubno/STITI era and are making moves in this experimental direction again. If you aren't standing still, you are progressing. Simple as that
__________________
Believe in Billy Records
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.