Now playing on dirty.radio: Loading...

  Dirty Forums > underworld.
Register FAQ Community Today's Posts Search

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 12-06-2005, 08:46 AM
big screen satellite
Still Number 1
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mon Calimari
Posts: 3,214
Re: 5 pounds for .MP3?
Quote:
Originally Posted by King of Snake
let's also take into consideration that we probably would not have heard these tracks at all if UW were still tied to a "cd only" record deal and we would still be waiting for the album to come out. UW have said that there will still be an album coming which I'm willing to bet will be released on cd/vinyl as usual.
well who's gonna start complaining when they release vinyl only 12" mixes - which are coming

(to be honest vinyl is an even older dying archaic art form...)
__________________
i will not be confused (with another FAN)
https://bigscreensatellite.borndirty.org
  #42  
Old 12-06-2005, 09:29 AM
stimpee
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 3,833
Re: 5 pounds for .MP3?
Now youre being pedantic
__________________
UW0764 || Professor: "Underworld have never failed to disappoint me" || Yannick changed my avatar picture.
  #43  
Old 12-08-2005, 03:48 PM
lostboy
river
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4
Re: 5 pounds for .MP3?
I too would like to see a lossless format release as it does make a difference to me. I don't like the way the OP put it, pretty rude considering how much Underworld do for us, their fans. However if it doesn't make a difference to you whether you can discern the difference between 192kbps mp3 and a lossless format such as flac, that doesn't mean that no-one can tell the difference. I have a reasonable pair of speakers and a above average amplifier (quad) and there is a massive difference to me between the two music formats.
Obviously the whole service is still experimental, but I don't think it's unreasonable to ask for a lossless format release, so that we can encode it as and when we want to. As someone else said it's kind of a step backwards to offer new releases in something less than CD quality.
As to things like bandwidth it's always possible to offer things via a bittorrent server. Perhaps when you purchase a release you get a unique torrent file paired with a key and you download the lossless release that way.
  #44  
Old 12-12-2005, 02:17 AM
froopy seal
amazinglytogetherpinniped
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cheezeburg
Posts: 917
Send a message via ICQ to froopy seal
Re: 5 pounds for .MP3?
Quote:
Originally Posted by big screen satellite
well who's gonna start complaining when they release vinyl only 12" mixes - which are coming
I'm complaining already. (Better not wait till they're released, I tend to forget things.) I want those mixes on cd! Or as mp3s if that's the only alternative to vinyl (yes, even if they're compressed).

My thoughts on the .mp3 vs. .flac discussion: We should consider ourselves lucky that only the file format is "crappy", not the music itself. Ever thought about all those people out there having to deal with this issue? I pity them, really.
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.