Now playing on dirty.radio: Loading...

  Dirty Forums > headset.
Register FAQ Community Today's Posts Search

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-01-2009, 03:54 AM
//\/\/
slogging it out
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: north of centre
Posts: 1,906
Michael Jackson was a child-molester - non-mourning thread...
...just so as not to offend anybody who sees music as more important...
__________________
uw0761
nutts2020
  #2  
Old 07-01-2009, 05:21 AM
chuck
i'm getting older too
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: my house!
Posts: 438
Send a message via ICQ to chuck Send a message via AIM to chuck
Re: Michael Jackson was a child-molester - non-mourning thread...
I'd doff my hair-sprayed cowlick your direction Nutters.

But I've just shaved my head.

For the record - I did go see MJ play in Auckland in 1996/97? - got freebie tix through a mate who was working for a brewery. Odd seats - odd concert.

I remember thinking he looked better on MTV than live - the sound mix was pretty rubbish as well.
__________________
Doesn't information itself have a liberal bias?

- S. Colbert
  #3  
Old 07-01-2009, 05:27 AM
Flywaver
vision
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Fens and Radsviliskis, Lithuania
Posts: 583
Re: Michael Jackson was a child-molester - non-mourning thread...
This was the best Live moment................ Jarvis Cocker!
__________________
DARKTRAINDRIVER...........
  #4  
Old 07-01-2009, 05:27 AM
chuck
i'm getting older too
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: my house!
Posts: 438
Send a message via ICQ to chuck Send a message via AIM to chuck
Re: Michael Jackson was a child-molester - non-mourning thread...
Also - are we allowed to appreciate the glory that was the Jackson 5 on this thread.

- one of the finer moments from Clerks 2.
__________________
Doesn't information itself have a liberal bias?

- S. Colbert
  #5  
Old 07-01-2009, 07:57 AM
34958hq439-qjw9v5jq298v5j
blue
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 950
Re: Michael Jackson was a child-molester - non-mourning thread...
Great idea, a thread about how you don't care. Please tell me your favorite musicians so I can do the same when they die. Did you know that Isaac Brock was a rapist?

Look, if you wanna talk about the child molestation accusations go ahead - guilty till proven innocent amiright???
  #6  
Old 07-01-2009, 08:23 AM
//\/\/
slogging it out
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: north of centre
Posts: 1,906
Re: Michael Jackson was a child-molester - non-mourning thread...
Quote:
Originally Posted by 34958hq439-qjw9v5jq298v5j View Post
Great idea, a thread about how you don't care.
it was set up so you wouldn't be offended and clearly signposted.

Quote:
Please tell me your favorite musicians so I can do the same when they die.
please grow up and stop taking this so personally

i guess the only musician who's death hit me in any was that of kurt kobain. by no means a saint; but he didn't molest boys. do your worst...

Quote:
Did you know that Isaac Brock was a rapist?
i'll remember that should i find out who he is.

Quote:
Look, if you wanna talk about the child molestation accusations go ahead - guilty till proven innocent amiright???
$22m paid for dropping the accusation is rather odd if you've done nothing wrong, after all...
__________________
uw0761
nutts2020
  #7  
Old 07-01-2009, 09:18 AM
34958hq439-qjw9v5jq298v5j
blue
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 950
Re: Michael Jackson was a child-molester - non-mourning thread...
Quote:
Originally Posted by //\/\/ View Post
it was set up so you wouldn't be offended and clearly signposted.



please grow up and stop taking this so personally

i guess the only musician who's death hit me in any was that of kurt kobain. by no means a saint; but he didn't molest boys. do your worst...

i'll remember that should i find out who he is.



$22m paid for dropping the accusation is rather odd if you've done nothing wrong, after all...
Not taking it personally. Just don't like being called a hypocrite, that's all. To hear someone say, essentially, "I'm glad he's dead" about a musician you like is offensive. Sorry.

If you think it's odd to pay to settle things when you haven't done anything wrong - I assure you, sometimes that is just the easiest way to do things. It is not an admission of guilt. It is simply the way the real world works. Twice in my life I have been in similar situations - one involving shoplifting, one involving a case of "computer hacking".
In the first case, I didn't commit the crime. Simple as that. In the second, I did perhaps do something wrong, but it was not exactly a crime, and the DA did not really understand what it was, and it probably wouldn't hold up in court. Both times there was someone who wanted justice, and both times I decided to 'settle', since it was simply easier for me. The settlements took less time overall than it took to fight the charges. Simple as that. I understand why someone who is 1000000 times more famous and faced with a crime 100000 times as bad would settle. Let's look at what the trial was doing to MJ - it destroyed his public persona, lost him some fans, took him away from music, constantly got him slandered in the media, and he suddenly found everyone who knew him selling him out, including his own sister. As for whether or not he did it - let's not forget that A) the media was so desperate to nail the guy, they paid a half million to seemingly anyone who knew him if they were willing to make up a story suggesting he did it, B) every other child friend he had defended him, C) the father made it fairly clear that he was only after money in the start, and D) even at the time, most people believed he was innocent. The media and the public wanted him to be guilty because he was a freak that did weird things and because it gave them someone to make fun of and villify.
  #8  
Old 07-01-2009, 05:11 PM
Rog
the fuckest upest
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: dustbin of europe
Posts: 1,201
Re: Michael Jackson was a child-molester - non-mourning thread...
Quote:
Originally Posted by 34958hq439-qjw9v5jq298v5j View Post
Not taking it personally. Just don't like being called a hypocrite, that's all. To hear someone say, essentially, "I'm glad he's dead" about a musician you like is offensive. Sorry.

we're not glad he's dead! just fed up with hearing how wonderful he was - when he obviously wasn't. i find that offensive........

and the rest of the post is pretty irrelevent being as 1. shoplifting and child molestation are not comparable and 2. computer hacking and child molestation are not comparable crimes either. The title of the thread tells you everything. You would be better off going back to the appreciation thread ............
__________________
UW0537
The truth, as ever, is subjective
  #9  
Old 07-01-2009, 06:41 PM
34958hq439-qjw9v5jq298v5j
blue
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 950
Re: Michael Jackson was a child-molester - non-mourning thread...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rog View Post
we're not glad he's dead! just fed up with hearing how wonderful he was - when he obviously wasn't. i find that offensive........

and the rest of the post is pretty irrelevent being as 1. shoplifting and child molestation are not comparable and 2. computer hacking and child molestation are not comparable crimes either. The title of the thread tells you everything. You would be better off going back to the appreciation thread ............
I'm responding to stuff like "good riddance"

I never implied that they were comparable in severity. The fact is both what I did and what he did were legal problems. In my case I was innocent. In his case, who knows. My point was that even if you are innocent it's sometimes altogether best to settle, and it doesn't necessarily mean guilt. This probably happens more than you'd think. But even if you don't see it - how is the fact that the trial was destroying his life irrelevant??
  #10  
Old 07-02-2009, 05:36 PM
Future Proof
Richard Simmons
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Section 8
Posts: 347
Re: Michael Jackson was a child-molester - non-mourning thread...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rog View Post
we're not glad he's dead! just fed up with hearing how wonderful he was - when he obviously wasn't. i find that offensive.....
Uhm... in a non-distorted summation of the truth, it's not obvious at all.
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.