Quote:
|
Originally Posted by big screen satellite
he was shite though
|
i quite liked that one - it was different form all the others in so many ways (bond not working for mi5, he gets married, cries when girl dies) it was a bond movie in the sense that it had james bond in it, but thats about it. i just dont see why that is a bad thing.
i suppose this again highlights why i dont get bond movies. they have made big movies fairly devoid of any emotionally developed characters, massive focus is placed on gadgets and cars (wtf? how can this carry a movie? - nobody claims that the rock was a great movie because it had a hummer and a lambo in it, there were other reasons). the girls are pretty much one dimensional unrealistic eye candy (im for this, in a sense, but repeat 20 times over? sometimes more than once a movie? hmmmmm).
bond movies = lazy.