|
Re: Underworldlive version 3.0 thread
Anyone else misssing the old style uwlive entries where the text was written on the photos themselves?
I'm trying not to say this from an archivist perspective as someone who would save every image that was posted everyday, but I really liked the layered effect of the posts in the past.
Whether it was a photo taken by Karl on stage with his own text or from someone else's camera.
These new images while very similar to the previous incarnation of underworldlive seem to be a bit different and off at times. I understand this is something to be expected when change occurs, but I really had grown to love the text placed over an image from a camera phone in such a way that it would shape and direct the viewers eye to a point or area in the picture. The wrapping of the text, sometimes sparse, other times verbose, seemed fitting for the photo, time, and place.
I would be curious to know what others here think of the new photoblog incarnation up at the site now and even what Karl or those in the underworld crew have to say about it.
I'm sure there are many positives and negatives to the new incarnation, such ease of editing and posting.
|