Who the f*ck is Philip Sherburne anyway and why should we care about anything he says?
really, I really don't see the point of some columnist overanalysing some band or some music and trying to prove some "point" that can't be proven and using lots of big fancy words to do it.
Quote:
|
a main-stage act grown accustomed to playing enormous, amphetamine-fueled festival crowds, where altitude becomes not a luxury but an imperative. Reduced to facilitating the indefinite buildup of adrenaline and the unbridled release of serotonin, the group ends up flailing in its very pursuit of transcendence.
|
uhhh....yeah man. Like...totally...whatever.
It's not even clear what the piece is supposed to be... is it a review of AHDO, or some sort of career overview?
His comments about STITI alone are proof enough that the guy doesn't have a clue. Or rather, proof enough that an opinion is just that, an opinion.