View Single Post
  #31  
Old 10-26-2006, 11:30 AM
bryantm3
It's Written In The Book!
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: alpharetta
Posts: 1,101
Re: Underworld rejected from ProgArchives
Quote:
Originally Posted by dubman
on no. 9. yeah, i thought about it too... i count 4. out of their whole discography, i count 4... 3 actually since i dont think skyscraper works and i *dont* count riverrun since it's published that those are seperte tracks and they left it to us to cut up.

on no. 5. no they dont. just because you hear an occasional guitar twang somewhere does not make it rock instrumentation. it is used wholly within an electronic context and only for that purpose. there isnt much BS about sounding anything like a rock band

on no. 6. THOSE ARENT SOLOS. if you've heard a proper solo theres the very important aspect of "showing off a player's technical proficiency". i dont heaar it, and thank christ, because i hate that anyway, and the concept of thinking that's valid when you're looking at a ton of buttons and presets is even more ludicrous.
unless it's an improv...

on 10. but they arent. hmmm.
i give up no 5.

6. listen to the first track on pizza for eggs

9. 'movement' pieces don't usually make up a ton of an artist's catalogue; there's usually one on every album (uw did this, except for AHDO)

10. i'm pretty sure there is a short cut for juanita.