View Single Post
  #16  
Old 10-25-2006, 02:25 PM
Icke
mouseman
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 188
Re: Underworld rejected from ProgArchives
Quote:
Originally Posted by King of Snake
you probably shouldn't really care either way. Sorry if that sounds harsh but is it really worth your time and energy to try and convince some people who you will never meet that run some kind site that no one cares about?

"your ultimate prog rock resource" is what the site says. However prog they may or not be, they are obvioulsy not a rockband.
Depends on your definition of rock .

Quote:
Originally Posted by bryantm3
6. Use of unusual time signatures, scales, or tunings. Many pieces use multiple time signatures and/or tempi, sometimes concurrently. Solo passages for virtually every instrument, designed to showcase the virtuosity of the player. This is the sort of thing that contributed to the fame of such performers as keyboardist Rick Wakeman and drummer Neil Peart.
check- there are keyboard/guitar/electronic choir solos (don't believe it's mellotron but not sure)
I don't think that the solo's in UW songs are meant to demonstrate the vituosity of the player. It is the overall structure that should/could be considered a sign of virtuosity. Though Karl's guitar solos are an exception, because they are played live. Not to downplay electronic music or anything, but programming a piano loop for example, how beautiful it may be, is not something that I (and probably most other people) would consider a sign of virtuosity.