[the real stuff]

Indeed, these are the reasons I'm looking forward to a dirty-hosted wiki. There won't be nearly as many reasons for us to step on eachother's feet.

So why bother dealing with Wikipedia? Well, I personally think Underworld deserves better recognition on Wikipedia. A complete and accurate discography is certainly desired, but it's a matter of what is deemed notable by the Wikipedia community. We've already flagged their attention with the Confusion the Waitress article. Like Matt said, I think we should focus on the more influential releases with concrete evidence (chart status, citable reviews/interviews, etc.).

The two projects will be markedly different. On Wikipedia our goal should be to establish Underworld as a significant influence to electronic music and popular culture. On the dirty.org wiki, we get to dive into all the details and eccentricities of the band, without having to formally introduce each article as "[[blah]] is a track by [[Underworld]], released in [[blah]] and reached [[blah blah]] ......." if you get what I mean.