|
Re: www.dirty.org/underworld/
You've seen a bundle of people argue that standards-compliant = text, or boring, or monochrome, or for lynx only, and dirty has traditionally put visual "design" (there's those quotes again) way above accessibility as a priority.
If people are ignorant about standards compliance and the benefits of accessibility, as most here appear to be, and the users who most benefit from it considered as a joke, it doesn't bode well, does it?
As before, I gently pointed out the benefits of standards-compliance, and some tips on how to achieve it; I wasn't the one who over-reacted, but will always respond to ignorance and short-sightedness.
Simon
__________________
[color=White]Automatically Sunshine[/color]
|