Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean
I just had a brief debate with a religious girl on another website in which she asserted that the complexities of the human body proved God's existence, because nothing that complex could possibly have come into being without the involvement of a "creator". I noted that if this was so, then that creator would presumably have to be at least as complex as humans if not moreso. I then asked her if a being's complexity inherently necessitated a creator, wouldn't that creator's complexity also necessitate a creator of their own? Her answer was that no, it didn't, because the nature of God is outside our realm of understanding. This is the kind of argument I always see. If you apply any logic or scientific method to the concept of "God", it simply gets brushed aside as irrelevant.
|
Actually, logic would dictate that a Creator can not be created. For if He was created, He could then not be the Creator. Therefor, for a Creator to exist, He would have to have always existed; ie being eternal.
That is logic in it's simplest.