Quote:
Originally Posted by froopy seal
As much as I respect Reznor's progressive approach, to me digital-only releases still aren't as valuable, as significant, as 'beautiful' as physical copies. Even if they comprise tons of additional photos and stuff. That's why I'm hardly ever psyched by an Underworld release if it's digital-only.
|
what did you thnk of the riverrun project then?
to me, that was some of the best work that they have done..
(although some of the tracks were available on vinyl), it was
mostly a digital release...
i think it was very significant when you look at their long list
of releases..
Quote:
|
With this opinion, I'm probably part of the analogue dinosaurs who will die out, by the by. But I have a feeling that there's still a decent share of music-lovers out there who think along the same lines, and who value CD + artwork over instant availability.
|
analog's not going anywhere... in fact, there's been a resurgence of vinyl if anything..
i've seen more underworld vinyl (and from other groups)..in the last decade,
compared to the first that they've been making music... and it's a LOT EASIER
to find now too...
just to be picky, if you're only referring to CD's, i classify those as digital medium
also..
maybe you were referring to just a physical release? but why limit it to CD's only?
later
-1