Quote:
Originally Posted by revolver9
I have some mp3s from years back that I encoded with iTunes that I have now encoded with LAME
|
... well just as the LAME encoder has improved over the years, i'm sure the iTunes one has as well. And as the results i posted above suggest, it has improved at low bit rates. If it improved at 128, then its for sure better at 192. I dont think Underworld would accept it otherwise and we would have noticed. Why not take the iTunes encoded 192 and take the WAV and encode it at 192 with LAME and do your own listening test?