Quote:
Originally Posted by //\/\/
eh?! you asked a question, i answered it. what do you mean by that nonsense? if you want to debate, let's do it. but i think you need to calm down somewhat, mister - the dark side is clouding your argumenting somewhat...
eh?! (again!) you'd certainly like to, it appears!
yeah; me know fuck-all. 
wonder why?
aaah; those 'most people'. and yes, 'most people' do do what you say. but i also contend that 'most people' also remember child molesters as being sick fuckers and don't really miss them when they pop their clogs.
aaaah (again!) - those 'most people' are back - and now they're sick of it, dammit! funnily enough, i haven't met a single one of these 'most people'. the 'most people' i've met think he was a child-molester. then again; 'most people' i know are parents too...
he wasn't found not guilty either, remember. he was in a position to pay to have the trial disappear - poof! like magic! i think that speaks louder for his guilt than his innocence.
you think otherwise - good for ya - you're not going to change my view, i'm not going to change yours. for a happy mourning, don't dine here. please. |
Ahh, I didn't know that was how you were answering the question. I mean what's the point of asking a question if you know the answer? True or false could I break into your house if I didn't steal anything?
I'm not saying we should gloss over it. I'm just saying I don't see any of it as relevant to the point where THAT is the first thing I think of when people mention MJ. As for "most people" - for the first trial, a poll came out revealing that showed that 80% of the public did not believe he actually did it.
I don't really like the tone implication of "if you don't have children, you don't understand how bad this is". I know damn well how bad this is.
Of course he wasn't ruled to be not "not guilty". He was acquitted on the second trial. There wasn't going to be a way to prove him 100% innocent but that's no fault of his own. The fact that he settled does imply guilt; but it's not hard to see why, if he was innocent, he would still settle. I don't believe it because the media is powerful and they tried really really hard to get a guilty verdict and still could not. That speaks a lot.