|
OWB Reviews
Links to reviews go here.
http://www.avclub.com/content/music/underworld Another C+. That's still above average! Line: over/under 6.5 on Pitchfork I bet under. I haven't even heard the album yet. |
Re: OWB Reviews
i bet exactly.
so far matt's right. not one review hasnt been utter nonsense, positive or otherwise. |
Re: OWB Reviews
Pitchfork review is up:
http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/articl...ion-with-bells |
Re: OWB Reviews
drowned in sound
http://www.drownedinsound.com/release/view/11153 some comments are better than review. |
Re: OWB Reviews
http://www.metacritic.com/music/arti...s?q=underworld
The Metacritic site has links to a number, including a couple 8s from NME and Billboard (which most non-die-hards will likely peruse)... FYI. |
Re: OWB Reviews
i'm kind of surprised at how well done the pitchfork review is, from the perspective of someone who's disappointed by it anyway. at least gave them their due instead of blogishly declaring it old and lazy.
|
Re: OWB Reviews
I've a couple of links to reviews of OwB on my blog.
I'd say overall they are possitive but the reviewers would like more uptempo tracks. Sofar I've seen 2 really negative reviews. On a scale of 1 to 10 it gets a 7.5 in total I would say. |
Re: OWB Reviews
Pleased to see Pitchfork plug Dirtyradio in that review too. :)
|
Re: OWB Reviews
when you read some reviews, its so unbelievable that they are still quite "nostalgic" about born slippy.
|
Re: OWB Reviews
Quote:
For a lot of people Nuxx is the only thing they know from Underworld, which is a real shame because, imo, it is far from their best piece ever and while it was something of a zeitgeist, things have moved on a great deal in music since. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.