![]() |
The Dark Knight
What is the anticipation level for everyone?
|
Re: The Dark Knight
Restrained giddiness. :)
Going to the IMAX. |
Re: The Dark Knight
Quote:
|
Re: The Dark Knight
anticipation level is off the scale here
|
Re: The Dark Knight
Very much looking forward to this. Batman Begins was outstanding.
|
Re: The Dark Knight
very giddy, slightly sad, preparing for "isn't it weird how he..."
|
Re: The Dark Knight
It comes out on my birthday so I am about to pi$$ my pants with antisipation...
|
Re: The Dark Knight
Quote:
What do you think of the IMAX experience? |
Re: The Dark Knight
Hellboy II > Batman, but this still looks extremely entertaining.
|
Re: The Dark Knight
i think for the first time in awhile im actually anticipating a movie. usually i'm perfectly content to let the date come around when i'll be seeing a film, but i'm actually a bit impatient.
|
Re: The Dark Knight
Quote:
|
Re: The Dark Knight
I was fortunate enough to see the film last week at an exhibitor screening. Over at another forum I posted some very broad *spoiler free* thoughts about the film. Anyone have any interest in reading them here?
|
Re: The Dark Knight
If they contain spoilers or any hints of spoilers, no. At least not until the movie comes out for the rest of us schlubs. :cool:
|
Re: The Dark Knight
Quote:
I'm amazed from what it does for a live concert. As far as movies go, I'm not so sure yet. |
Re: The Dark Knight
Quote:
|
Re: The Dark Knight
post that hot fire!
|
Re: The Dark Knight
Quote:
Did you see the Rolling Stones film in IMAX jOHN? |
Re: The Dark Knight
What Batman Begins did efficiently was being an origin story that started with the right foot forward. With all those pieces in place, in film two we can get down to business.
The film is structured and paced at such a fine clip that you don't notice the time. A great deal of this is attributed to the story and how involving it becomes very quickly. Christopher Nolan and his co-screenwriter and brother Jonathan have focused more on the dramatic elements of the story. That's not to say that the film lacks action, there is plenty of it, but for what seems like a first, Nolan has made an almost entirely chronological film. The next point of issue is Heath Ledger, who does a fine, fine job as The Joker that is truly quite startling at times. The Joker's dominance of the story is such that he's a catalyst, but not always primary. Expect praise for Ledger's work here, and rightly so, you cannot tell it's him throughout the film. Ledger is exquisite and has some of the best scenes in the film. His nihilistic behavior and antics are quite something to behold, and have been built up a bit, to the point that pessimism could enter the viewers mind, but then something disturbing occurs that throws that pessimism to the wind. Ledger's portrayal reminded me of a lot in reflection of a wild, anarchic version of the killer John Doe in se7en, portrayed by Kevin Spacey. I'm surprised no one has made this analogy yet. The Joker has an utter lack of regard for anyone or anything. The difference being, John Doe's intention was a bit deeper, The Joker is much more surface, chaotic, anarchic(not to be redundant using the same word twice), and malicious, with the selflessness that he doesn't care, even about himself. The usual suspects are present from the last film. Scary Gary Oldman as Gordon, who is now becoming a bigger fish in the food chain, Lucious Fox still doing the R&D for Bruce Wayne, and now Maggie Gyllenhaal replacing Katie Holmes as Rachel. Gyllenhaal is quite an improvement over Katie Holmes, not that Holmes was bad, but Maggie is a far superior actress. Also new to the cast is Aaron Eckhart as Gotham District Attorney Harvey Dent. His role and prominence in the film only grows as the film progresses. These characters are so well composed within this large mosaic of a story that weaves from act to act with relative ease neither feeling forced or noticeable to the viewer with one or two exceptions in the last act of the film. Each of these characters mentioned above, exude a strong emotional pull that begins subtly and swiftly. With some events that occurred in the film I found myself reacting quite strongly. Not to demoralize the film for it's time of release or content, but the emotional responses it elicited I find myself experiencing more often during the pandering award season later in the year. I'm convinced that while this is a 'tent pole', 'comic book film', it's also quite serious in it's tone and structure and treatment of the story and characters that most audiences will fail to see or acknowledge. The story just wraps you up and takes you away from the beginning. Just like the previous film, there are no titles, the film just starts. People were raving back when Spiderman 2 came out about it being the best comic book sequel. I should clarify before progressing any further that I found that film difficult to sit through. This film, as a sequel is leaps and bounds above Spiderman 2 or any other film in this genre. Close comparisons could be made to X-Men 2 and that is a very valid comparison that The Dark Knight exceeds. But this film while not quite at the level of say The Empire Strikes Back or The Wrath of Kahn is pretty damn close. It's that good. A great deal of this should be attributed to Christopher Nolan's respect and treatment of the source material and the property and some bright folks having faith in a filmmaker for once instead of undermining them. I realize I've been quite vague and this has been a very deliberate choice. If there is more that would like to be known, please ask. |
Re: The Dark Knight
Quote:
|
Re: The Dark Knight
oh I had no idea Holmes had been replaced. Thats great news! This has nothing to do with her personal life blah blah but I thought she was quite unbelievable in her role in the first flick.
|
Re: The Dark Knight
A great article about how they shot key scenes of the movie with the IMAX camera & film, and the lack of CGI FX throughout the film.
Dark Knight Director Shuns Digital Effects For the Real Thing http://www.wired.com/entertainment/h...7/ff_darknight |
Re: The Dark Knight
Quote:
|
Re: The Dark Knight
Thanks for the general overview, grady. Looking forward to the film!
|
Re: The Dark Knight
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1117563/
Batman: Gotham Knight comes out tomorrow. It looks amazing, and it takes place within this movie's universe. Can't wait to watch it myself. |
Re: The Dark Knight
Quote:
I got my allowance today! |
Re: The Dark Knight
I wanted to see this opening weekend in IMAX, but tix are basically sold out for every showing in every IMAX theater, unless you want to sit in the very front on one of the far sides. This sucks. I wish someone had told me they'd go on sale three weeks in advance.:(
|
Re: The Dark Knight
For what it's worth about not being able to see it IMAX due to the sell outs so far in advance, this popped up in a paragraph over at Anne Thompson's blog on Variety:
Finally, I would have preferred to see The Dark Knight in 35 mm, not IMAX. (I will go see it again when it opens July 18.) While the sequences that were shot with giant cameras were stunning at the IMAX venue--especially the deep detailed helicopter shots over Gotham and the amazing car/truck chase filmed in Chicago's freeway tunnels--I found the movie overwhelming. link When I saw the film it was also in standard 35mm and it was just as engrossing, that said, IMAX would've been great, but 35mm was suffice. |
Re: The Dark Knight
Quote:
Is 35mm focal length? Never shot a movie and never had a camera. |
Re: The Dark Knight
They were filming this movie for forever in Chicago last year. They tried to keep it under wraps, but EVERYONE knew it was the Batman movie. They even made up a fake name calling it "Rory's First Kiss" but it was so friggin obvious when you'd walk down the street and see all the cop cars labeled 'Gotham City Police Department'.
|
Re: The Dark Knight
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/35_mm_film IMAX is shot on 70 mm film, so it has significantly more resolution that normal film. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMAX#Technical_aspects |
Re: The Dark Knight
The ASC finally got their text online from the most recent issue involving the Batman. Worth a read, either before or after the film in regards to the process of shooting in the IMAX format.
link |
Re: The Dark Knight
Heath Ledger as the joker is the best part of the movie. I was absolutely glued every second he was on screen. This movie was a lot of fun, apart from it feeling a little too long.
....and Chicago has never looked so badass. :) |
Re: The Dark Knight
Quote:
|
Re: The Dark Knight
Damn, that's one great film. Heath Ledger was the Joker. There wasn't even a trace of him there. And Aaron Eckhart as Harvey Dent/Two Face was spot on casting. Hell, Christian Bale pretty much had third billing here, and he was Batman.
I wonder who the next villain(s) will be in the next film. |
Re: The Dark Knight
The quintessential comic book movie?
I would venture a "hell yes." |
Re: The Dark Knight
spoiler?
SPOILER felt a little long but heath ledger had obviously come a long way since '10 things i hate about you.' he was by far the best part of the movie... I'm not sure I was very drawn into the film by the other characters as much. There were no real light moments to make the dark moments impact you so much more. The light moments for me ocurred during what were intended to be some of the darker moments, for me... when real sadistic things happened, I laughed, because Ledgers's performance was quite good. |
Re: The Dark Knight
Amazing Movie, totally blown away by Heath's performance......actually....I don't even think Heath was ever on set, the Joker was played by the Joker instead. :cool::cool::cool:
|
Re: The Dark Knight
Say it last night (after waiting for two sold-out shows to finish :o).
It was indeed very dark, suspenseful, and raised some interesting issues. There are amazing action sequences, but between the sustained tension and moments of heightened terror, i felt pretty dark myself upon leaving. Such a marvel the difference between Nolan's two films and the increasingly comic and cheesy 4 predecessors. |
Re: The Dark Knight
good enough to see it twice in one day? yep.
yeah yeah yeah it's great and all that. i actually wanted the movie to keep going as long as it did, and the joker was obviously the best part of the movie. the hospital scene was just... beautiful. |
Re: The Dark Knight
Quote:
might spoil might spoil might spoill: Uff. simply incredible. Gun powder bombs, patriot act, money burning and Fuck Morality. I love it!. The hospital scene is tops but i kind of love more the billions of dollars burning more and the "patriot act" machine is amazing too. But i could pretty much say one word about the movie: Joker. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.