Re: we are just to nice.
 

aww don't get down. It took me forever to find it as well.

Re: we are just to nice.
 

whats with the shitty attitude in this thread? someone asked a question and if you want to answer it, answer it. if you don't, then cut the sarcasm and quit acting like it was staring us right in the face.

for the record, the search feature on these vbulletin boards sucks ass. i wouldn't rely on them.

Re: we are just to nice.
 

Yup! Thread title issues aside, ;) it doesn't take two seconds to post a link. Not everyone reads all the threads all the time, or visits the boards daily, so yeah.

On the other hand, one can quickly scan a thread to see if it is what one is looking for. So yeah, also.

I think what I am trying to say very diplomatically is that there is evidently no need to get snitty with people, but there is also no need to assume that other people will always do the "work" for you. A bit of give and take on all sides goes a long way. :)

Re: we are just to nice.
 

okay, it seems like the shitty attitude started in this thread started with my post, and im sorry if i offended you, paula.

but my point still remains, the excuse of a badly named thread is fine in this case, but honestly how long does it take to scan three threads? my guess is most people read all of the threads in the underworld section of this forum


edit: what jane said ^^^^^^^

Re: we are just to nice.
 

how hard?

as i type this now, the "this may be too demanding" thread is currently the 11th topic down the page. 13th if you count the stickies. thats a LOT to weed through, dontcha think :P

Re: we are just to nice.
 

if we're gonna get technical about it, at the time of the question being asked, it was the third thread (fifth including stickies).

anyway, i answered the question didnt i? and i didnt think i was that hard on paula either

maybe im just a miserable git.....

Re: we are just to nice.
 

haha. no it wasnt that bad of a response (the second one was worse imo) but yer the scapegoat for all the other responses like that of late.

re: 3rd thread. if someone were to ask now, the same thing would have been said.

Re: we are just to nice.
 

Sorry, guys! Didn't mean to cause a fuss. I just find that asking questions here gets a tad... dangerous. :)

I did read this entire thread and the announcement thread beforehand and there was no mention so I asked the question. Search sucks because it limits characters so one can't even search for cue, tap, cat, pop, or poo. I do not read every thread in the underworld forum, only those that look interesting. Searching for sheet now I see that thread comes up but I'm still not sure I'd have looked at it.

Anyway, my apologies again. I'll make even more of a more of an effort to find things on my own in the future.

Cheers and thanks!

Re: we are just to nice.
 

Maybe I should just take the flack and rename the threads. I get shit anyway so I may as well ;)

Re: we are just to nice.
 

Hey, I just wanted to say thanks, That is a great show. I really enjoy the new tunes and the other stuff as well it has a good flow that I can really get into,