![]() |
Re: The beginning of the end for P2Ps/Torrent Sites?
Actually I am feeling bad. Not about breaking this particular law but about breaking a law in general.
Still, copyright needs to be changed. Some intelligent people think that 14 years are enough. This month Born Slippy has fallen into Public Domain. 14 years may seem a little short, but it will result in more diverse content, not less. Unfortunately, copyright in its current form is not compatible with the Internet... maybe someday someone will find a solution that doesn't compromise user privacy. btw, how do you justify to yourself being a member of RTSR and illegally sharing copyrighted Underworld material, therefore breaking a law? |
Re: The beginning of the end for P2Ps/Torrent Sites?
Quote:
Don't get me wrong, I love the ability to easily share files when used responsibly. I don't want to see p2p websites shut down. I just want to see people held reasonably accountable for stealing music/movies and such (along the lines of having to pay the 99 cents they should have been paying for every commercially available track they've stolen) so that smaller artists aren't put out of business. I think this is a perfectly reasonable stance to take. Quote:
|
Re: The beginning of the end for P2Ps/Torrent Sites?
Quote:
How do you explain the incredible success of the iTunes store or Beatport? Obviously there are loads of people more than willing to shell out cash for their mp3's, even when the prices aren't exactly all that attractive in all cases compared to physical media. You have to have a certain degree of luck and be doing just the right thing (or sell your soul and start making Euro Trance) to be able to have a career in music (or any other kind of creative endeavour). It seems to me it's always been like that, filesharing or not. |
Re: The beginning of the end for P2Ps/Torrent Sites?
I don't know guys.
Sean gave a perfectly concrete example of what has been happening all over the music industry this decade. And responses, while interesting reads, does nothing to overturn the point. File sharing has crippled creativity, clearly seen in his example, to a level where I'm sure this chick can actually see disparity between her revenue and the mass copies of her music out on market, extrapolated out to affect the entire industry. Thank god for youtube and myspace because they have offset the otherwise consolidation of music output towards modonna and britany spears. But just because intarnets offer exposure isn't an excuse to use the same media to rob the industry. It just means that more cash in hand consumers are able to be reached to compensate. I can't wait for all file sharing, bit torrent sites and p2p to just go away and everything water down to people just making love letter mixes on blank cd's. Simply out of my love for music do I say this. |
Re: The beginning of the end for P2Ps/Torrent Sites?
as a counter point i found this masters thesis on the impact of file sharing on indie record labels.
Quote:
Quote:
But I still think the issue is cloudy to see what is really going on even for the management of these labels. 1. Most of the qualitative support towards file sharing is actually negative support for the actions of the RIAA and the corporate record labels. 2. They don't distinguish the difference between file sharing and exposure. Whereas I see a huge difference on a simple fiscal level. Exposure is radio, streaming audio like rhapsody, youtube, or myspace embedded files. File sharing is simply owning the damn music. |
Re: The beginning of the end for P2Ps/Torrent Sites?
Quote:
But then again - it's not like the movie industry is running out of cash. And yes - just because they make money, is not a reason to allow rampant file copying and dvd pirating to continue. Not at all - but one of the MPAA/RIAA's major arguments is that online piracy is affecting the bottom line. That's a hell of a bottom line - and having a wife who works in the industry, I'm aware of the implications. And it'd be nice if the MPAA would get the research that they base their accusations on - you know, within the realm of a reasonable margin of error. Quote:
I should repeat myself - I'm all for fair use, and fair recompense for people who make stuff. Copyright is designed to do that - it's meant to protect those people for a reasonable time. As currently enforced though - copyright is so prohibitive it's insane (the rights issues around Watchmen being made into a movie and Alan Moore's refusal to be connected with his own work is one example) - and it's an endgame that the big corporates are going to be unable to win. Not without serious losses on all sides. IMO. |
Re: The beginning of the end for P2Ps/Torrent Sites?
Quote:
Also, I don't think its that cut and dry to argue that artists have traditionally made their money only on shows and the merchandise they sell at them, so its moot to argue for the artists' benefit when it comes to piracy. For one, that's only been the case because industry has argued they needed to pay for those uber expensive plastic media devices, (which is pennies to the dollar), and then all their awesome work at product placement (yeah right, like mtv is anything like youtube). Or recoup the cost of having to take on other unsuccessful acts. (if someone's shit is unsuccessful, its the studio time at risk, that's it) I mean that's all going away. More than ever its word of mouth and the quality of the work. period. Second, Say you're in a band called Citizen Dick, which is huge in Belgium. How do you know if you're huge in Belgium if the belgians have just downloaded your shit, and not bothered to buy it? To wit, where is your fan base? where do you tour? |
Re: The beginning of the end for P2Ps/Torrent Sites?
Quote:
|
Re: The beginning of the end for P2Ps/Torrent Sites?
Quote:
|
Re: The beginning of the end for P2Ps/Torrent Sites?
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.