![]() |
Re: Michael Jackson was a child-molester - non-mourning thread...
Quote:
...but that's not a bad idea... :cool: |
Re: Michael Jackson was a child-molester - non-mourning thread...
Quote:
|
Re: Michael Jackson was a child-molester - non-mourning thread...
Quote:
Nobody's really glossing over it. Do you live in an alternate universe where celebrity sex scandals are ignored? Pretty much every article or special I've seen on the man lately at least mentions it. Most people prefer to remember the recently deceased for the good things. People joke about Jackson a lot but it's not really discussed anymore because most people are sick of it and no matter how you slice it there's really no hard evidence. If he was found guilty it's another story. Still I guess you're living proof that an accusation is enough to condemn a person. Guilty 'till proven innocent. |
Re: Michael Jackson was a child-molester - non-mourning thread...
Quote:
[/QUOTE]Nobody's really glossing over it.[/QUOTE] eh?! (again!) you'd certainly like to, it appears! Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
you think otherwise - good for ya - you're not going to change my view, i'm not going to change yours. for a happy mourning, don't dine here. please. |
Re: Michael Jackson was a child-molester - non-mourning thread...
Quote:
|
Re: Michael Jackson was a child-molester - non-mourning thread...
(ooh, it's like the old daisies in world, innit!)
|
Re: Michael Jackson was a child-molester - non-mourning thread...
Quote:
I'm not saying we should gloss over it. I'm just saying I don't see any of it as relevant to the point where THAT is the first thing I think of when people mention MJ. As for "most people" - for the first trial, a poll came out revealing that showed that 80% of the public did not believe he actually did it. I don't really like the tone implication of "if you don't have children, you don't understand how bad this is". I know damn well how bad this is. Of course he wasn't ruled to be not "not guilty". He was acquitted on the second trial. There wasn't going to be a way to prove him 100% innocent but that's no fault of his own. The fact that he settled does imply guilt; but it's not hard to see why, if he was innocent, he would still settle. I don't believe it because the media is powerful and they tried really really hard to get a guilty verdict and still could not. That speaks a lot. |
Re: Michael Jackson was a child-molester - non-mourning thread...
Could you two have beer now or something? But not together, because then you boys get stupid and beat each other up.
I'm gonna hit some whiskey! It's after noon already, so I don't meet the def. of an alcoholic. You two do the same! |
Re: Michael Jackson was a child-molester - non-mourning thread...
Quote:
|
Re: Michael Jackson was a child-molester - non-mourning thread...
Quote:
and the rest of the post is pretty irrelevent being as 1. shoplifting and child molestation are not comparable and 2. computer hacking and child molestation are not comparable crimes either. The title of the thread tells you everything. You would be better off going back to the appreciation thread ............;) |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.