Dirty Forums

Dirty Forums (https://www.borndirty.org/forums/index.php)
-   underworld. (https://www.borndirty.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Underworld and Prog Bands (https://www.borndirty.org/forums/showthread.php?t=2353)

jose m 01-17-2006 02:41 AM

Re: Underworld and Prog Bands
 
rick wakeman is tall so is rick smith,fuck they're both called rick as well.

stimpee 01-17-2006 05:06 AM

Re: Underworld and Prog Bands
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BeautifulBurnout
Tell you what, Mr Moderator: why not provide us with a template of how you would like to see posts in threads. That way I am sure we will all bow down to your views and not post anything that falls below your meticulous standards in future. :)

can you please quit it with the Mr.Moderator stuff? I'm not telling people what to write. I was asking for more information. I got that information and gave thanks. Take your sardonic comments elsewhere.

On a lighter note, I suggest you watch Spinal Tap again, as the parody stretches across many genres.

justy 01-17-2006 08:49 AM

Re: Underworld and Prog Bands
 
Quote:

Stimpee wrote:

ive yet to hear a harpsichord solo [in Underworld's music]
I know it's not Underworld, but Orbital uses one to great effect in the second and third "movements" of "The Box"!

holden 01-17-2006 09:19 AM

Re: Underworld and Prog Bands
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by stimpee
So apart from the fact that UW have released some long songs, some of which have been in parts, its a bit of a stretch of the imagination. You're welcome to listen to your old prog rock albums (whether youre 15 or 43) but I dont think Underworld's name should be stained by prog rock comparisons.

No, it's a stretch of your imagination. I stand by my assertions. i knew you'd disagree;)

patrick 01-17-2006 12:46 PM

Re: Underworld and Prog Bands
 
i am pretty sure that karl himself has mentioned about how they feel highly influenced by bands such as floyd and can and definatly brian eno. i´m sure someone will have a good memory and know for sure, but it is something that i think they have said.

and this is rediculous. like a facist thread if i have seen one ever!

BeautifulBurnout 01-17-2006 01:51 PM

Re: Underworld and Prog Bands
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by patrick
and this is rediculous. like a facist thread if i have seen one ever!

I couldn't possibly comment! ;)


Hehe. Seriously though, we shouldn't blur the lines between Stimpee the Moderator and Stimpee the Person. (Even if I deliberately chose to earlier :p). He is expressing a personal view here, however unreasonable that might be! I don't think that means he is stamping his Moderator Jackboot on anyone though. ;)

//\/\/ 01-17-2006 02:31 PM

Re: Underworld and Prog Bands
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BeautifulBurnout
Spinal Tap was rock, not prog rock for a start. ;)

"are you suggesting that we do a free-form jazz improv in front of a festival audience?"

they may have been rock for a long time; but they got prog. as stimps points out - stonehenge was a concept album and tour; you don't get more prog than concept albums...;)

holden 01-17-2006 02:44 PM

Re: Underworld and Prog Bands
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by //\/\/
they may have been rock for a long time; but they got prog. as stimps points out - stonehenge was a concept album and tour; you don't get more prog than concept albums...;)

i disagree with any inclusion of Spinal Tap into the prog scene, because the band was basically an extended joke on a lot of happenings in music during the 70's-80's. Additionally, though concept albums are perhaps more common in progressive rock, if concept albums make you prog, you've just included the Beatles and the Who in there, for "Sgt Pepper" and "Tommy" respectively.

Underworld (well, mk II and on, anyway) have been about doing their own thing, using elements of different musical styles to new effect. Their ties to art, conceptual themes, and musical exploration are much more than the average band. To me, that makes them "progressive". If Prog rock in general makes you cringe, then perhaps you are only thinking of it at its worst and most overblown. That was not always the case...The music was, in it's day, very cutting edge, totally unlike what was happening in rock and pop. Like it or not, it has its place as a movement and many modern acts owe much to the genre (from space rock to shoegaze to IDM).
I don't think it's at all sullying the name of UW to call them progressive, because they DO share traits with that movement. The first time i heard "Stagger", it reminded me of some old King Crimson track. Certainly, they have been an electronic dance band for some time, and that's where their bread and butter is, how they ultimately are labeled and regarded, etc. But simple reasons such as their willingness to experiment with long musical movements, release incredible ambient and challenging music, create whole atmospheres with word/sound/performance/art, well, that's a step ahead of most acts today...Moving forward; advancing. Progressive. :)

holden

//\/\/ 01-17-2006 03:02 PM

Re: Underworld and Prog Bands
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by holden
i disagree with any inclusion of Spinal Tap into the prog scene, because the band was basically an extended joke on a lot of happenings in music during the 70's-80's. Additionally, though concept albums are perhaps more common in progressive rock, if concept albums make you prog, you've just included the Beatles and the Who in there, for "Sgt Pepper" and "Tommy" respectively.

"sense of humour failure - level b"

holden 01-17-2006 03:09 PM

Re: Underworld and Prog Bands
 
i lost my humour with this thread pages ago! Thanks for the clarification, though...can't say i've followed the Tap's career:rolleyes:
Since i was a kid, i've been "that guy" defending bands i liked and felt were more musically developed than the top 40 poop everyone else was heralding. Guess i'm still at it:o

//\/\/ 01-17-2006 03:22 PM

Re: Underworld and Prog Bands
 
a thread about prog rock was always going to be devoid of humour - and that's probably where prog and uw part company - there's always been a playful nature about uw, whereas prog was incredibly po-faced - rock dinosaurs that thankfully got punk going. the uk dance music ethic was also very punk. ergo - new thread - uw and punk.

this thread needed tap not as a factual reference; but to stop it disappearing up phil collins' jacksie!

change 01-18-2006 08:50 PM

Re: Underworld and Prog Bands
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by amoe
I like Floyd, and Tool if they qualify.

So, does Tool Qualify? And this may be stretching it, but what about Nine Inch Nails? I feel The Fragile was a pretty progressive album. As much as I love UW (my favorite artists), The Fragile is my all-time favorite Album. As a whole.

justy 01-19-2006 11:04 AM

Re: Underworld and Prog Bands
 
This thread has an air of young people dismissing music their parents liked, and by young, I mean younger than 40.

Todd Rundgren was prog, and while he had his share of too-serious-to-loosen-up epics, some of his music is hilarious (check out the song "Onomatopoeia").

You could call Frank Zappa prog, but he took the piss on the form as often as not.

And the Ozric Tentacles are frequently very funny, if song titles are any indication, to their link with electronic music (Merv Pepler, drummer, playing d'n'b breaks live-on-a-kit on some early 90s songs).

stimpee 01-19-2006 04:11 PM

Re: Underworld and Prog Bands
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by justy
This thread has an air of young people dismissing music their parents liked, and by young, I mean younger than 40.

I would like to agree with you and in general its usually the correct comment but some young things here have been perverted by prog. ho hum.

Flywaver 01-19-2006 04:30 PM

Re: Underworld and Prog Bands
 
And the Ozric Tentacles are frequently very funny, if song titles are any indication, to their link with electronic music (Merv Pepler, drummer, playing d'n'b breaks live-on-a-kit on some early 90s songs).[/quote]

Isn't there link Eat Static?

big screen satellite 01-20-2006 01:46 AM

Re: Underworld and Prog Bands
 
some people like Genesis and Underworld at the same time and we're trying to find a link...

there's no need...

end of thread...thank you

justy 01-21-2006 12:34 PM

Re: Underworld and Prog Bands
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flywaver
Isn't their link Eat Static?

That's correct: Merv and Joie of Eat Static were both members of Ozric Tentacles until the late 90s.

As for links... isn't it enough that people like any of these bands at the same time? Influences might be pretty tenuous (and I'd say, rather than a thread about prog rock being humorless, any thread that asks people to defend their favorite genres of music will be humorless, as some get really defensive), but it might be instructive to take a look. Even if it goes so far as to say that, for instance, prog is more classically influenced (ELP covering Aaron Copland and Bach), while electronic music (esp. Underworld) is more influenced by contemporary classical composers like Cage and Glass (that is, minimalist and other types of avant-garde which leaked into rock music via Eno and Throbbing Gristle (and if you've been listening to latter day Genesis P'orridge, you've been listening to post-prog psychedelic rock-- and there's probably a difference between those genres too).

But they all feed on each other... so who gives a fuck? Enjoy the music you enjoy.

Dace Doughnut 01-24-2006 06:33 PM

Re: Underworld and Prog Bands
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Flywaver
Indie had it too.Many bands were ahead of there time but never really hit the mainstream or they started off a trend.A great band was Curve for example.Anyone like Curve?

FECK! yes, curve were fantastic. first too EPs were anyway, 'ten little
girls' immediately springs too mind. shit albums though; but toni haliday! what a front woman! prolly looks like a boot these days but is still trying apparently. would never describe them as prog though.... and even less
inclined to dig out the cds (could never get the hang of vinyl).


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.