Obama/Clinton CNN thing

[jOHN rODRIGUEZ]

I know I'm showing some flaming here, but that scarf(i really need to begin checking for typos more often) is neeto. And I don't want one.

[BeautifulBurnout]

I know I'm showing some flaming here, but that scrap is f bitchin'.

Linky would be good, jOHN. I am too tired (*cough* lazy *cough*) to look for it myself. :p

[Sean]

Linky would be good, jOHN. I am too tired (*cough* lazy *cough*) to look for it myself. :pWishful thinking on your part, eh Janie? ;)

Here's a link (http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/04/clinton-obama-f.html). I watched the event last night. Hillary seems to have basically found a way to say "I think Obama is unelectable" without actually saying the words "I think Obama is unelectable", and she'll likely get a relatively free pass on it from the press if this plays out true to history. The pitiful thing is, I think what Obama said was fundamentally true, but Hillary is attacking full force based purely on semantics.

We'll see how it all plays out....:rolleyes:

[Dirty0900]

I wish our voting for PM was this interesting.

[Strangelet]

Wishful thinking on your part, eh Janie? ;)
The pitiful thing is, I think what Obama said was fundamentally true, but Hillary is attacking full force based purely on semantics.

so does Robert Reich, the economic advisor for bill clinton. He wrote this beauty on his blog this weekend.

Compare his comments with what we've actually heard pundits say on TV

jackass 1: Of course this will come back to bite Obama, I don't think he's ever going to win now.

jackass2: I'm not bitter when I shoot my gun. And I'm offended at the insinuation.

and on and on

Obama, Bitterness, Meet the Press, and the Old Politics

I was born in Scranton, Pennsylvania, 61 years ago. My father sold $1.98 cotton blouses to blue-collar women and women whose husbands worked in factories. Years later, I was secretary of labor of the United States, and I tried the best I could – which wasn’t nearly good enough – to help reverse one of the most troublesome trends America has faced: The stagnation of middle-class wages and the expansion of povety. Male hourly wages began to drop in the early 1970s, adjusted for inflation. The average man in his 30s is earning less than his father did thirty years ago. Yet America is far richer. Where did the money go? To the top.

Are Americans who have been left behind frustrated? Of course. And their frustrations, their anger and, yes, sometimes their bitterness, have been used since then -- by demagogues, by nationalists and xenophobes, by radical conservatives, by political nuts and fanatical fruitcakes – to blame immigrants and foreign traders, to blame blacks and the poor, to blame "liberal elites," to blame anyone and anything.

Rather than counter all this, the American media have wallowed in it. Some, like Fox News and talk radio, have given the haters and blamers their very own megaphones. The rest have merely "reported on" it. Instead of focusing on how to get Americans good jobs again; instead of admitting too many of our schools are failing and our kids are falling behind their contemporaries in Europe, Japan, and even China; instead of showing why we need a more progressive tax system to finance better schools and access to health care, and green technologies that might create new manufacturing jobs, our national discussion has been mired in the old politics.

Listen to this morning’s “Meet the Press” if you want an example. Tim Russert, one of the smartest guys on television, interviewed four political consultants – Carville and Matalin, Bob Schrum, and Michael Murphy. Political consultants are paid huge sums to help politicians spin words and avoid real talk. They’re part of the problem. And what do Russert and these four consultants talk about? The potential damage to Barack Obama from saying that lots of people in Pennsylvania are bitter that the economy has left them behind; about HRC’s spin on Obama’s words (he’s an “elitist,” she said); and John McCain’s similarly puerile attack.

Does Russert really believe he’s doing the nation a service for this parade of spin doctors talking about potential spins and the spin-offs from the words Obama used to state what everyone knows is true? Or is Russert merely in the business of selling TV airtime for a network that doesn’t give a hoot about its supposed commitment to the public interest but wants to up its ratings by pandering to the nation’s ongoing desire for gladiator entertainment instead of real talk about real problems.

We’re heading into the worst economic crisis in a half century or more. Many of the Americans who have been getting nowhere for decades are in even deeper trouble. Large numbers of people in Pennsylvania and across the nation are losing their homes and losing their jobs, and the situation is likely to grow worse. Consumers are at the end of their ropes, fuel and food costs are skyrocketing, they can’t go deeper into debt, they can’t pay their bills. They aren’t buying, which means every business from the auto industry to housing to even giant GE is hurting. Which means they’ll begin laying off more people, and as they do, we will experience an even more dangerous downward spiral.

Bitter? You ain’t seen nothing yet. And as much as people like Russert, Carville, Matalin, Schrum, and Murphy want to divert our attention from what’s really happening; as much as HRC and McCain seek to make political hay out of choices of words that can be spun cynically by the mindless spinners of the old politics; as much as demagogues on the right and left continue to try to channel the cumulative frustrations of Americans into a politics of resentment – all these attempts will, I hope, prove futile. Eighty percent of Americans know the nation is on the wrong track. The old politics, and the old media that feeds it, are irrelevant now.

[Strangelet]

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=4649610

clinton getting heckled for continuing this charade.

[34958hq439-qjw9v5jq298v5j]

I think Clinton's just grasping at straws here. Could Obama have chosen his words better? Of course. But come on, the man gives speeches on a daily basis, do we really need this? Not only that, but I think there was a lot of truth to what Obama said. He's a real stand up guy - I'd be real happy to see him win.

[BeautifulBurnout]

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=4649610

clinton getting heckled for continuing this charade.

She just doesn't have the same presence as Obama, imo. And if she says "you know..." one more time I will have to slap her.

[jOHN rODRIGUEZ]

. . . well, you know . . .

The right side, the right side. I want it red!

[Deckard]

This whole furore surrounding his guns n' god comment is just utterly ridiculous. Watching it all unfold from the outside and take the predictable path it has is so deeply depressing. And seeing it so sanctimoniously pounced on and misrepresented by Clinton as well.... when clearly she knows precisely what he meant, but realises there are enough idiots out there who will respond by gut rather than by mind if she plays it that way... a textbook example of why so often we all end up with the kind of politicians that we do, and will continue to do so until people get more educated.

Obama, throughout this whole campaign, has repeatedly broken those twin golden political rules: (1) never show intelligence if it's going to confuse the idiocracy, and (2) never be honest if it's going to upset the idiocracy. (With thanks to Cacophony for that word ;) ).

The bitterness row falls clearly into the latter.

More and more, it's looking like America (at least Democrat-voting America, but let's face it, we know the Republicans would be the same only worse) simply isn't ready for someone like Obama.

[Sean]

...And seeing it so sanctimoniously pounced on and misrepresented by Clinton as well.... when clearly she knows precisely what he meant, but realises there are enough idiots out there who will respond by gut rather than by mind if she plays it that way... a textbook example of why so often we all end up with the kind of politicians that we do, and will continue to do so until people get more educated.That sums it up beautifully in my opinion.

[dubman]

it's nice to see that in the face of what could have been civil campaigns and shocking decency on all sides (relatively), that there will be someone who will gloriously fuck it up and remind everyone how utterly demoralizing this process usually is.
IT'S SO COMFORTING.

this should have ended in california :mad:

[jOHN rODRIGUEZ]

More and more, it's looking like America (at least Democrat-voting America, but let's face it, we know the Republicans would be the same only worse) simply isn't ready for someone like Obama.


I'll bite my tongue. For now.

[cacophony]

frankly i would prefer if you didn't, and instead said something meaningful for once. for someone who participates as frequently in the world forum as you do, you never ACTUALLY participate.

so why don't you just say what's on your mind instead of constantly playing coy, as though somehow we're all psychic and can read what's going on behind the wink-wink-nudge-nudge posts?

[jOHN rODRIGUEZ]

qwack qwack qwack.

Where the hell have you been?

[cacophony]

just as nonsensical as usual. :rolleyes:

[jOHN rODRIGUEZ]

Bucephalus Bouncing Ball???

[Sean]

It's a waste of time, Cacophony.

[cacophony]

i know. i just thought one good appeal might get through. it was a naive effort. :p

[jOHN rODRIGUEZ]

Not like it's the first time it's taken time to bring everyone up to snuff.

[Deckard]

More and more, it's looking like America (at least Democrat-voting America, but let's face it, we know the Republicans would be the same only worse) simply isn't ready for someone like Obama.
I'll bite my tongue. For now.
Honestly... hiding behind these short oblique posts all the time just isn't cool, really it's not. :confused:

You come across as sounding like you're either attention seeking (in a weird passive-aggressive way), or just very unsure about what you have to contribute. If the latter, well, I'm sorry, I've tried engaging you in conversation as have many others, but it goes nowhere. This isn't "gang up on jOHN" or anything, but surely you can see by now that posting up these short deliberately ambiguous comments then never engaging with the responses is a dickish thing to do?

If it sounds like I've completely taken your post in the wrong spirit, well, once again, sorry, but there's a lesson for you - be less cryptic!!!

</naive last attempt>

[Strangelet]

jOHN,

From someone concerned, I think you might benefit from this (http://www.amazon.com/Stepping-Stones-Recovery-Cocaine-Addiction/dp/1568385129)

[jOHN rODRIGUEZ]

Deckard,

Not a damn thing cryptic about it at all. No one's hiding here.



Strangelet,

Ladies first, but baking soda isn't the real thing.

[Deckard]

jOHN,

Two penguins rest, unaware of the lazy marshmallow glued to the railing.

[jOHN rODRIGUEZ]

The penguins are the lazy ones, but there's really four up to this point.

[Deckard]

Haha, good man.

I won't even attempt to take my own nonsense seriously.

But you carry on though.... ;)

[jOHN rODRIGUEZ]

Not that I needed your permission to do so.

But thanks for your encourgement none-the-less. (insert a smiley of your choice here, admin has removed my smiley privileges.)

Edit: :);)