View Full Version : Lovely Broken Thing
bryantm3
11-12-2005, 10:56 AM
the first track... listening to it now... eww... this is awful. this doesn't sound like the stuff they were playing in concert at all.
bryantm3
11-12-2005, 11:03 AM
the second track... a lot more ambient and much more promising than the first track. that first track was some awful shite. sounded like someone farting into a pillow. this one reminds me a little bit of the quiet part at the beginning of genesis' 'Duchess'.
bryantm3
11-12-2005, 11:07 AM
the third track... sounds like more of the first.. or like steve hackett's 'a tower struck down'.
holden
11-12-2005, 11:13 AM
hey, bryantm3, as much as i'm with you for your love of Genesis (and other projects Genesis related), i'm not hearing the similarities :confused:
but i hope you're liking what you're hearing after JAL to Tokyo!
bryantm3
11-12-2005, 11:20 AM
not as much sounds the same, but serves the same purpose in the track... if that makes any sense.
fourth track... sounds like some weird singing under a waterfall.. i can hear the intro to lenny penne now.
the mongoose
11-12-2005, 11:46 AM
it's like every other UW release:
You'll HATE (!) it on first listen
You'll sort of warm to it a couple of listens after
Two weeks later you'll be singing along to the poetry
A few days after that you'll be turning it up and considering it a good one.
Weirdest thing.....:confused:
the third track... sounds like more of the first.. or like steve hackett's 'a tower struck down'.
Very...., er, useful information :confused: ?
I can clearly see why you need a new thread for this. Although on the other hand, that might be a very good thing this it might ensure that your ranting stays isolated...
EDIT:
@The Mongoose
I do not "always hate an Underworld track at first" :) .
bryantm3
11-12-2005, 12:09 PM
the last two tracks were pretty good. but i really wish that they would never ever release track 1 and 3. those are the most horrible tracks i have ever heard from underworld.
gambit
11-12-2005, 01:12 PM
It'll grow on you. Trust me.
dubman
11-12-2005, 01:19 PM
it had better. i don't know if i can tolerate a "peggy sussed" hater. ;)
sanakan
11-12-2005, 01:36 PM
the last two tracks were pretty good. but i really wish that they would never ever release track 1 and 3. those are the most horrible tracks i have ever heard from underworld.
me, on the other hand, really loves JAL to tokyo!! i wasn't that excited when it first showed up (woolford mix/PT), but on the lovely broken thing release it so works (at least for me ;) )
'(a lot of poisson)'
11-12-2005, 02:23 PM
it's like every other UW release:
You'll HATE (!) it on first listen
You'll sort of warm to it a couple of listens after
Two weeks later you'll be singing along to the poetry
A few days after that you'll be turning it up and considering it a good one.
Weirdest thing.....:confused:
I totally agree with you.
for lenny penne the first listening was not amazing, but when they played it in live... :eek: it was huge!
Tania
11-12-2005, 04:34 PM
I dont understand the concept of "hating" an Underworld release upon first listening to it. That seems odd to me.
I get it that some songs may not click at first and eventually kinda grow on you, but hate is a strong word... !!!
I havent heard Lovely Broken Thing yet...but when I do, I'll be sure to take notice of #1 and #3.
34958hq439-qjw9v5jq298v5j
11-12-2005, 05:04 PM
the last two tracks were pretty good. but i really wish that they would never ever release track 1 and 3. those are the most horrible tracks i have ever heard from underworld.
Are you out of your mind? Those are the two best ones on the release...
bryantm3
11-12-2005, 08:25 PM
the vocals sound garbled and awful. it sounds like what hell would be like.
dubman
11-13-2005, 08:05 AM
obviously you haven't been privy to the stylish and articulate musings of a band called Anal Cunt.
anyway, i'm with the numbers guy. you're dissing on the two best tracks there.
very confusing.
Thing In A Book
11-13-2005, 08:52 PM
He obviously never heard of vocoders :)
I love JAL to Tokyo. I always try to sing along. Even if i don't have the full lyrics on screen to follow :)
the mongoose
11-13-2005, 10:59 PM
talk about ruining a track........:(
the vocoder is just godawful and uninspired...really doesn't do the lyrics (or Karl's voice) any justice and I'd agree it makes the track just *snooze* right on by.....so please kill the "Cher Machine".:(
that was my initial reaction to Jal on This Thread (http://www.dirty.org/forums/showthread.php?t=1419&page=1&pp=10)
now I'd say that I love the plucking bass synth lead and that Karl says "Fuck It" and that ending is such a nice buildup......etc.
not an album quality track but a nice intro into the "B-Side Themed EP";)
:p
the vocals sound garbled and awful. it sounds like what hell would be like.
Starscream: "There's no escape this time, Optimus Prime!"
groovypanda
11-14-2005, 12:14 AM
it's like every other UW release:
You'll HATE (!) it on first listen
You'll sort of warm to it a couple of listens after
Two weeks later you'll be singing along to the poetry
A few days after that you'll be turning it up and considering it a good one.
Weirdest thing.....:confused:i thought that was what autechre fans did...;)
viddy
11-14-2005, 08:31 AM
I really dig the first track, it's got a nice groove to it.
And I also really like the very last little singing bit by KH. Mmm, magical...
stimpee
11-14-2005, 08:36 AM
its great, and its good value i think. If you go into HMV to buy any back catalogue CD it sets you back £4.99 for a single. This is 30mins, 7 tracks for the same price with a load of art thrown in for good measure.
No complaints.
potatobroth
11-14-2005, 09:28 AM
my only complaint is that it makes me hungry for more :D
its gonna be real nice when we have 5 or 6 of these to pick from.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.